<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Murch wrote</title><author_name>Murch (npub1j5…nsd5c)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1j5mp526z5fkz9wkrk6mt5nzu43xndyrwkr8mnqngdqwytgcpc5vqcnsd5c</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Curious if this is an unpopular opinion:&#xA;It was with too hard to get a BIP processed in the past and now people put BIPs on a pedestal. &#xA;&#xA;But BIPs are author documents. Especially in Draft stage, they do not present community consensus — they&#39;re the authors’ personal recommendation to the Bitcoin community.&#xA;&#xA;It seems good to me that we get a few controversial BIPs. It clears up that it&#39;s still the readers’ responsibility to make up their mind.</html></oembed>