<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Vlad wrote</title><author_name>Vlad (npub12q…ypdx8)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub12qz56plzehejkyp4waaannmnny4y4c30j8q55a3wlk49haslga2snypdx8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>My 2 cents on the whole “let’s freeze the bitcoins that don’t move to quantum resistant addresses” debate&#xA;&#xA;JUST DO A FUCKING HARD FORK&#xA;&#xA;Abandon the old network, let the quantum computers steal all the worthless coins&#xA;&#xA;Move to a better chain that fixes all the issues of the current one&#xA;&#xA;Let everyone claim their coins 1:1 on the new chain. Lost or unclaimed coins are still there, just in case the users return one day. Satoshi can return in a few decades, his coins will still be there. &#xA;&#xA;Quantum resistance is exactly the kind of existential upgrade for which a hard fork is justified. Don’t half ass this upgrade with something so suboptimal that a limited time for moving coins is even proposed. &#xA;&#xA;Soft forks are for trivial stuff. For anything major, just hard fork.</html></oembed>