<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>fade2 wrote</title><author_name>fade2 (npub17q…qqk7t)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub17q3j55mthp94vctscu6nqk0f2e64tz33fercat2ld628hef6rcqs8qqk7t</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>nostr:nprofile1qqs8gkwnxwhkvpn0qek0sauku6gdkw5klaznf70d7n4twn0j7grj3xcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctv9upppux4 quantum is all FUD however, could one argue that CJing mitigates quantum risk by spreading out UTXOs?&#xA;&#xA;Should we lean into this idea for plausible deniability reasons? Eg. I used CJ to mitigate quantum risk vs. Privacy.  &#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>