<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] wrote</title><author_name>Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] (npub1m2…a2np2)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2022-07-09&#xA;📝 Original message:On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 07:26:22AM -0700, Eric Voskuil wrote:&#xA;&gt; &gt; Due to lost coins, a tail emission/fixed reward actually results in a stable money supply. Not an (monetarily) inflationary supply.&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; This observation is not a proof of lost coins, that is an assumption.&#xA;&#xA;To be clear, are you claiming that there is no proof that coins are lost?&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;https://petertodd.org &#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@petertodd.org&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 833 bytes&#xA;Desc: not available&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220709/d3a4c87c/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>