rich1.0freemymind 🇨🇠wrotefreemymind 🇨🇠(npub1kl…0u2uq)https://yabu.me/npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uqnjumphttps://yabu.meSuch a strong argument about why "intellectual property" is non-existant. Since property does only make sense on finite resources. When I eat a portion of paste, this same portion of pasta can not be eaten by somebody else.
But when nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet59uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv9a85ctdduhxuet59uqzpdlddzcx9hntfgfw28749pwpu8sw6rj39rx6jw43rdq4pd276vhuqlc0ve was writing this article I refer, I am not taking away anything from him in order to share his ideas.
Means we can accept intellectual exchange as pure increase of knowledge. I can learn about it without anybody needing to forget it. Therefore one can not logically suppose, that one can own information the same way one can own physical resources. Therefor intellectual property is logically non-existant. What does not mean, that it is without value. Therefore I can freely decide to give something for a information that was shared with me.
nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzpdlddzcx9hntfgfw28749pwpu8sw6rj39rx6jw43rdq4pd276vhuqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet59uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv9a85ctdduhxuet59uqqsur0wqkkx6psxc7e7674