<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Sacred Peak wrote</title><author_name>Sacred Peak (npub16j…zq4nn)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub16jad3sjdf0hynxhmpzpsuuwazqlxrcq824kjpw3w7wr8ldt3xm0q0zq4nn</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>lol&#xA;the polls are wrong, yes. the polls are left biased. so it&#39;s actually better.&#xA;&#xA;no. polymarket is not a predictor. it is a gambling site and now that the whole Kamala Harris loss/Trump win was &#39;predicted&#39; by it, it too is not reliable.&#xA;&#xA;you don&#39;t think a bunch of Liberals will go on there now that they have seen what happened in the US to make it look a certain way? think about it. manipulation is the LPC game. &#xA;&#xA;Making it look bad for Conservatives causes demoralization and less Conservative voting and less people in the middle to vote Conservative. &#xA;&#xA;you aren&#39;t wrong about the polls but the reason why they are biased is that they oversample Liberals (and to some degree, the NDP) they have always been like that. and, a poll moving in a direction is an indicator.  &#xA;&#xA;Conservatives are less likely to take a poll (we never answer them at this house) and activists (Lib/NDP) want to take polls.&#xA;&#xA;what is more indicative is people&#39;s sentiments in person and online and they strongly indicate Conservative. &#xA;&#xA;only the election will show the truth.&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;m not predicting anything just paying attention to everything. &#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>