<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>nycatx wrote</title><author_name>nycatx (npub1mu…5n96w)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1mu0kdue2rx0r5ctvzr8gzvwufjjx3fw8p83eaam5unc2wadn2m0qh5n96w</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>This seems to be more opinion than fact. Sure there’s a high probability that those weapons could potentially be used for that purpose, but it’s a non zero probability that wouldn’t be the result. &#xA;&#xA;Interesting to take any side in a conflict that supports harming other humans. Both sides could just agree to not harm the other, but that’s too much to ask for</html></oembed>