<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>vicariousdrama wrote</title><author_name>vicariousdrama (npub1yx…p7kza)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1yx6pjypd4r7qh2gysjhvjd9l2km6hnm4amdnjyjw3467fy05rf0qfp7kza</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>As a dev, I dont want client devs creating standardized WoT algos.&#xA;&#xA;Thats a centralizing technique.&#xA;&#xA;Instead, we should be building tools to empower users to define, share, and refine their own algorithms/filter rules.&#xA;&#xA;By far the best clients today that do this are...&#xA;1) Amethyst - for letting users define word/phrases to filter out&#xA;2) Gossip - for list management&#xA;3) Nostrudel - for list management&#xA;&#xA;Clients going in the wrong direction imho are those tying to create or apply dev controlled built in algorithms.. Notable offenders include&#xA;1) Primal - for the trending lists that just focus on most quotes and replies as a popularity contest amongst influencers&#xA;2) Coracle - for incessant WoT scoring algo based on follow lists and mute list&#xA;3) Damus ? is it now joining the follow/mute algo bandwagon?&#xA;&#xA;Reliance on DVMs as a WoT filter is also perilous. Though using it for answers and discovery has merit.&#xA;&#xA;#devstr #nostr #grownostr</html></oembed>