<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Susie wrote</title><author_name>Susie (npub1hw…503sg)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1hwgw0uznr49t4gullpgfz4m5xnakl5a0l88m3k382xv7ys0tfmlsd503sg</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>HMRC wants more power over financial data. The problem is that Bitcoin is not a bank account.&#xA;&#xA;Once names, home addresses and tax IDs are linked to a Bitcoin address, that information can stay connected to a public ledger indefinitely.&#xA;&#xA;Europe is already seeing the consequences when crypto holders’ identities and holdings are exposed.&#xA;&#xA;France saw 19 verified physical attacks on crypto holders in 2025. A French tax official was charged after using government software to look up crypto investors&#39; details and passing data to criminals.&#xA;&#xA;I spoke to HM Revenue &amp; Customs, Recap, BULL BITCOIN and Knightbridge Tax about what the UK and EU rules could mean for privacy, self-custody and physical security.&#xA;&#xA;Tax enforcement should not create a target list.&#xA;&#xA;My latest for Forbes.&#xA;&#xA;https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2026/10/08/hmrcs-proposed-crypto-powers-could-increase-physical-security-risks/</html></oembed>