<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Dan Goodman wrote</title><author_name>Dan Goodman (npub14c…2rfvf)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub14c5eddu9ddulgvgh8zrk9mz954tw32zymd4h88aj27f0g8lddy3sa2rfvf</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>wait I&#39;m confused. You&#39;re not arguing for peer review as we do it now where the outcome is only binary? What is true peer review? Is it just peer review where the reviews are published? What makes this the true thing that is so important for science, given that it&#39;s a recent innovation and not in widespread use?</html></oembed>