<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Jeremy [ARCHIVE] wrote</title><author_name>Jeremy [ARCHIVE] (npub1q8…8qwta)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1q86n5vtxkwerzwfqza3hwls8pl8764244464talfqy2vpj0qaz6q38qwta</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2021-09-04&#xA;📝 Original message:Hi Bitcoin Devs,&#xA;&#xA;I recently noticed a flaw in the Sequence lock implementation with respect&#xA;to upgradability. It might be the case that this is protected against by&#xA;some transaction level policy (didn&#39;t see any in policy.cpp, but if not,&#xA;I&#39;ve put up a blogpost explaining the defect and patching it&#xA;https://rubin.io/bitcoin/2021/09/03/upgradable-nops-flaw/&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;ve proposed patching it here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22871,&#xA;it is proper to widely survey the community before patching to ensure no&#xA;one is depending on the current semantics in any live application lest this&#xA;tightening of standardness rules engender a confiscatory effect.&#xA;&#xA;Best,&#xA;&#xA;Jeremy&#xA;&#xA;--&#xA;@JeremyRubin &lt;https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin&gt;&#xA;&lt;https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin&gt;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210903/1d2d16a4/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>