{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"weev wrote","author_name":"weev (npub1we…409xg)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1weev88wc43slz6jjlq2h30ltmd0ccu9utfe8wet2kkax0w6epavqw409xg","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"Do I need to repeat myself? \n\n\u003e Seems like a security disaster, ripe for a multitude of race conditions and consensus attacks on supply, state, and immutability, architecturally completely an autistic dream that is not possible to soundly implement.\n\nI don’t think we should change the entire transaction validation mechanism to add excessive complexity.\n\nShouldn’t HTLCs accommodate these additional L2s? I don’t understand why, if you want a chain with alternative features and functions, you can’t just use HTLCs like Lightning does. Lightning already does about a billion dollars worth of transactions monthly, seems like the concept of using HTLCs to interface with an additional layer is pretty proven. It seems the necessary interface is already there. I guess I am just too stupid to understand. \n\nBIP300 is one of those “ideas guy” moments where something very bold is proposed without a lot of mind put towards the implementation being completely nightmarish. "}