{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"ODELL wrote","author_name":"ODELL (npub1qn…w95gx)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"RE: BITCOIN SOFT FORK CHATTER\n\n- I DO NOT THINK THERE WILL BE MOTIVATION TO ACTIVATE A SOFT FORK TO “IMPROVE SELF CUSTODY” UNLESS FEE RATES RISE SIGNIFICANTLY.\n\n- A MINORITY SOFT FORK PUSHED THROUGH WITHOUT CLEAR CONSENSUS CAN BE QUITE DANGEROUS. COULD CAUSE AN UNINTENDED HARD FORK. MOST TECHNICAL PARTICIPANTS REALIZE THIS AND WOULD NOT TRY.\n\n- BITCOIN STAKEHOLDERS ARE MORE DIVERSE THAN THEY HAVE EVER BEEN. PRETTY MUCH GUARANTEES ALL CURRENT PROPOSALS WOULD BE CONTENTIOUS.\u2028\u2028\n\n- IN THIS ENVIRONMENT AND GOING FORWARD I ACTUALLY LEAN TOWARD RESPONSIBLE HARD FORKS WITH FAR OUT FLAG DAYS MEASURING IN YEARS OR DECADES, NOT MONTHS, AND REPLAY PROTECTION.\n\n- A MINORITY CAN HARD FORK SAFELY. ANYONE CAN HARD FORK WITHOUT PERMISSION. IT IS OPT IN. NO FUNDS AT RISK.\n\n- I DO NOT CURRENTLY SUPPORT ANY PROPOSALS. IF THERE WERE A FORK TODAY I WOULD NOT FOLLOW IT."}