{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] wrote","author_name":"Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] (npub1m2…a2np2)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-07-09\n📝 Original message:On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:43:49PM +0400, naman naman wrote:\n\u003e Hi,\n\u003e \n\u003e This approach raises the obvious question : If someone hasn't had access to\n\u003e their coins in a long time (yrs, decades, however you want to define it) -\n\u003e and they wish to access/move them after such a time - isn't your proposal\n\u003e simply taking away their ability to do so? Some might call it : stealing\n\u003e their coins.\n\u003e \n\u003e How does one conclusively prove that \"lost\" coins are \"lost forever\"?\n\nRe-read the article: https://petertodd.org/2022/surprisingly-tail-emission-is-not-inflationary\n\nIt has nothing to do with re-assigning ownership of coins.\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 833 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220709/5fcea1ad/attachment-0001.sig\u003e"}