{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"postr wrote","author_name":"postr (npub18v…d8xj9)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub18v9ll5jdu96qmn33tpyqdwnjc0fz4adquevj8cav23vlcc4zfh8qpd8xj9","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"trying to understand your bitcoin lens:\n\ni think maybe anything (anything?) can be described in terms of physics.  but quantum physics can possibly allow a description of _bitcoin_ as quantum computation…in an ideal sense of how things play out/manifest/are realized…\n\nif it’s (somewhat) accurate…i’ve been intrigued.\n\nalso, though, i can think how everything depends on the language one uses to describe  something.\n\nand so also, there’s the thought that if everything “is physics,” then so is bitcoin.\n\n///\n\nthen to calle’s quantum slop points…\n\nspoke w a physics professor last year who basically said (as said elsewhere too) that quantum computing has a materials problem.  it’s an issue w the physical hardware that makes it (currently?) infeasible, like it’s a problem for room temperature superconductivity.\n\n#wishiknewmorephysics!"}