{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"OCEAN wrote","author_name":"OCEAN (npub1qt…87dze)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝗕𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴?\n\nWithout transparency, miners can’t verify they’re being paid fairly for their hashrate contribution. Take FPPS (Full Pay Per Share) pools, for example. Many assume that contributing 10% of the pool’s hashpower means they’ll get 10% of the block rewards, minus a simple 2% fee (or whatever the pool advertises). Sounds straightforward, right?\n\nWrong. In reality, miners often earn far less than expected. Why? FPPS pools need massive reserves to guarantee daily payouts, especially during stretches of bad luck. To build and maintain these reserves, pools introduce hidden fees, murky spreads, “lost” shares, and opaque calculations. Meaning miners are left guessing the true value of their accepted shares and often left earning much less than they’d expect.\n\nSo, how do you fix this?\n\nhttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlTuyUyWgAElfhv?format=jpg\u0026name=small"}