{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"Artel21 wrote","author_name":"Artel21 (npub1c9…4wghc)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1c9gyxxxf2l2g26ga0menv2lueh870w744s729u0cp3pm5y3fkv3sw4wghc","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"From what we see, people don't actively think about it. Removing discount is a must. All existing implementations violate the rules. We need a new discussion and consensus to restore out property rights.\n\nMore scientific/physics based take on nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqpqqae7kkvzg9syxwvygkd7wnzr0n5ye9nq2njsg542npxzryd0fjfq77qxj6 would be like:\nMost of Bitcoin's internal history  (Big Bang + rapid expansion) happened within 1st halving therefore 1MB is the only safe option we have really.\n\n\u003eDo you think there is currently a clear way to protect against the block size inflation attack vector?\n\nAs of now we are actively exposed to this because 1/4 witness discount supported by all codebases. Spam is just one symptom. \"Bear market\" is a fiat version of this. Chain exceeding 1TB is another more real symptom. The root cause is witness discount paired with a bigger block. We must return to 1MB and no discounts."}