{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"hodlbod wrote","author_name":"hodlbod (npub1jl…jynqn)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"I think there needs to be social proof for nips. Not just \"I use this\" which is stupid and not provable, but formal working groups that agree on a certain version of NIPs. nostr:nprofile1qywhwumn8ghj7mr4de3kscn00qh8xctwv3mkjcmg9enxzund9uqzpem34u9stj8ftlxldl4n2qz5f5hmrnxns3uga86fpwe7u28ga4n03mwys9 and I talked about this a while back. Call them \"cabals\" just for fun. Depending on who is in a given cabal, or how many forks a given cabal's spec has promotes the cabal. This is better than flat voting because different cabals will take a different level of ownership/responsibility for the spec they maintain. We can't just get rid of politics because we like decentralization."}