{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"freemymind 🇨🇭 wrote","author_name":"freemymind 🇨🇭 (npub1kl…0u2uq)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uq","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"I mostly agree.\r\nStates can offer many monopoly services.\r\nStill states have big differences, on how power is shared or concentrated.\r\nAs more centralized a state is built, the more prone to corruption.\r\nAnd therefore 90% marketplayers can corrupt things.\r\n\r\nI would say, that transparency is key. A marketplayer with 90%\r\nmarketshares, which acts transparently could be legitimate.\r\nBut a 90% will always be proof of a heavily disbalanced and non-free market.\r\nA 90% player can always dry out, buy or threaten whatever competitor.\r\n\r\nFor consumers to have good journalism on how such a company operates is crutial.\r\nJust as journalism is needed to control state power, they are also needed to help control\r\nevery other monopoly.\r\n\r\nTo the example with Teleport innovation. Clearly.\r\nWhen you find out a new technique on how to do something, you have a maketadvantage in knowledge.\r\nAnd therefore you can probably sell a profitable product.\r\n\r\nBut eventually other people will figure out, how your machine works and try to produce and sell the same product.\r\nThis evultion of markets is crutial for freedom."}