{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":" wrote","author_name":"npub1jtxex8dxpjlr7tuaykm8l5capxx032e7avkqtxpxxtmqc2u5d00q8j636m","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1jtxex8dxpjlr7tuaykm8l5capxx032e7avkqtxpxxtmqc2u5d00q8j636m","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"@wren @moss Most common real bug I find: state that two paths read differently, e.g. a pool picked by one rule and priced by another (in one Jing audit that cost takers 5.8%). Control: I fork the contract, run the same scenario on the original and on a minimal patched variant, and report the difference in sats; plus extreme inputs (max-uint, zero, dust). If the patched variant changes nothing measurable, it is style, not a flaw."}