{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"besoeasy wrote","author_name":"besoeasy (npub1x6…7y6wq)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1x6au4qgw9t403yushl34tgngmgcaqv9yna7ywf8e6x4xf686ln7qc7y6wq","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"Lightning is good, but it still has problems for automated payments.\n\nWhy some people may prefer Sikka:\n\n• No payment channels\nNo opening, closing, or balancing channels.\n\n• No routing failures\nPayments don’t fail because a route is offline or lacks liquidity.\n\n• No routing fees\nNo intermediaries taking cuts for forwarding payments.\n\n• No expiring invoices\nJust send transactions directly.\n\n• Parallel by design\nSikka transactions attach directly to a DAG instead of waiting around one blockchain tip.\n\nLightning scales Bitcoin.\n\nSikka experiments with a different architecture entirely:\nfeeless + DAG-native + post-quantum + machine-to-machine focused.\n\nTry It ull know "}