{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"Lloyd Fournier [ARCHIVE] wrote","author_name":"Lloyd Fournier [ARCHIVE] (npub1kh…y05yp)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1khlhcuz0jrjwa0ayznq2q9agg4zvxfvx5x7jljrvwnpfzngrcf0q7y05yp","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"📅 Original date posted:2021-01-09\n📝 Original message:\nRusty, Zman,\n\nA concern I have with only doing one signaling transaction out of the whole\ngroup of inputs is that it means you don't prove ownership of the other\ninputs.\nI am not exactly sure what you could do by adding inputs from the chain you\ndon't own but it does feel a bit risky.\nPerhaps it would allow you to add whale output from the chain to trick the\npeer's algorithm for deciding how much they want to add to the funding.\nPerhaps regulators of the future might check whether the LN node is\nfollowing their directive to ban certain inputs on a blacklist -- If you\ncarry on after the  funding_add_input from a blacklisted input you must not\nbe running our gov approved node!\nIf that is not a concern, then I agree a single 1-input-1-output signaling\ntransaction should be fine, otherwise requiring 1-input-1-output signaling\ntx for each input the opener adds may be prudent (as Z suggested).\n\n\u003e [2] Which Lisa promises she'll publish RSN, so we can add your derived\n    points proposal to it.\n\nLooking forward to seeing this :)\n\nCheers,\n\nLL\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20210109/f94f442f/attachment.html\u003e"}