{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"naman naman [ARCHIVE] wrote","author_name":"naman naman [ARCHIVE] (npub170…0rw80)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub170nq032tl9edal23vwpkv44m6l02qw5m2q8qv9j6jn0urdssadlqr0rw80","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"📅 Original date posted:2022-07-10\n📝 Original message:Hello ,\n\nThanks for the correction - it however boils down to the same principle :\ndiluting other holders, possibly excessively, if you miscalculate the coins\n\"lost\".\n\nWhich boils down to the same question again : How would you definitively\nknow that coins are \"lost\" or simply not accessed for x amount of time?\n\nRegards,\nthenoblebot\n\nOn Sat, 9 Jul, 2022, 9:48 pm Peter Todd, \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 09:43:49PM +0400, naman naman wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Hi,\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e This approach raises the obvious question : If someone hasn't had access\n\u003e to\n\u003e \u003e their coins in a long time (yrs, decades, however you want to define it)\n\u003e -\n\u003e \u003e and they wish to access/move them after such a time - isn't your proposal\n\u003e \u003e simply taking away their ability to do so? Some might call it : stealing\n\u003e \u003e their coins.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e How does one conclusively prove that \"lost\" coins are \"lost forever\"?\n\u003e\n\u003e Re-read the article:\n\u003e https://petertodd.org/2022/surprisingly-tail-emission-is-not-inflationary\n\u003e\n\u003e It has nothing to do with re-assigning ownership of coins.\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220710/0ae17a8a/attachment.html\u003e"}