{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"Jackk wrote","author_name":"Jackk (npub183…faslh)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"Reducing FUD and building on ECC is the way, thank you!\n\nHow could we even verify the claim of an attack? Literally every spend on Bitcoin looks like a valid spend, how does the community actually verify an attack? \n\nThere is an incentive to push this fud because it’s not falsifiable from on-chain data alone, it literally requires us to go to their domain of physics.\n\nSeems to me in the Bitcoin vs Quantum standoff, both sides are pointing guns at each other but only one of the guns loaded.\n\nThe question really becomes, is Bitcoin empirical proof for the quantization of time? Is it enough to demand physics to abandon continuous time models?\n\nIf this is true, their models are broken."}