{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"steepdawn974 wrote","author_name":"steepdawn974 (npub18w…58w27)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub18w5m3n6cpq4axlhvrpz4kf4mqjj87j5wsddvrrr75s6gvulwzc3s458w27","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"Citrea publishes some whitepaper(!), for a bridge that would benefit from relaxed OP_RETURN limits.\n\nImmediately everybody at Core: \"yeah let's DROP the limits - they're useless anyway. LFG 🚀\"\n\nAll the while other major changes (e.g. CTV) there's years of filibuster: Where is your signet implementation? Where is your documented user demand? Where is the documented consensus? etc etc etc\n\n[Ironically, something like CTV would have done away with the interactive presigning ceremonies that particularly hinder 2way pegs such as said Citrea's bridge]\n\nYou see the point why people are confused by how Core is handling that, don't you???\n\nBesides, blocking dissenting voices from GH for the slightest of disagreements is absolutely disgusting 👎\nThis may break the straw for many ppl\n\n"}