{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"epsql wrote","author_name":"epsql (npub1zh…vs67x)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1zhmsa0fs76dctwag0slvg4j9xqxu9q66dkkzxh7ls9pu4d0f9qkqgvs67x","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"I was implicitly referring to inscriptions when mentioning ordinals, sorry for the confusion here. What I meant is that when inscriptions became a thing and the PR to filter them was proposed by luke-jr by matching against OP_FALSE OP_IF, why did not Core propose relaxing the OP_RETURN limits then? I'd expect that to have been the rational thing to do given the arguments with respect to UTXO set bloat\n\nI don't think there is any conspiracy on the part of Core, and I appreciate that filtering spam is not some easy task to be carried out over the weekend, but I don't understand the timing for this proposal, unless this is entirely explained by Citrea as its catalyst.\n"}