{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"ehmjay wrote","author_name":"ehmjay (npub14l…303ze)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub14lynvghtf4uup7m4u4hqc9z48aepfv9yv647hg2vkwyk33n4te4qd303ze","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"But why not at least be open to it if you can recognize it's technical superiority?\n\nWhy do Bitcoin maximalists outright reject it?\n\nWhat's wrong with saying \"well, obviously I'm going to continue using BTC for now since it has a lot of support at the moment, but I'll also help advocate for this incredibly promising technology\"?\n\nAnd yes, Nano really is is \"SO MUCH\" better, Bitcoin maximalists just refuse to acknowledge it as such.\n\n### Compared to Bitcoin\ninstant \u003e\u003e 30-60 minutes for confirmation\ndeterministic finality \u003e\u003e probabilistic finality\nfeeless with no barriers for even the poorest people \u003e\u003e $2 and eventually $70+ fees\nzero supply inflation \u003e\u003e 2% annual inflation\nuncapped throughput \u003e\u003e 3-7 tps\nincentivized decentralization \u003e\u003e incentivized centralization\nNakamoto Coef of 10 with $125M market cap \u003e\u003e NC of 2 with $500B mc\nno rent-seeking middle-men \u003e\u003e miners\nnegligible energy usage \u003e\u003e 120TWh annual energy usage\n\n### Compared to Lightning\nfeeless with no barriers for even the poorest people \u003e\u003e \"minimal\" fees\non-chain decentralization and security \u003e\u003e centralized and custodial sidechain\nsimplicity \u003e\u003e extreme complexity prone to bugs, vulnerabilities, and failures\ndirect P2P payments \u003e\u003e liquidity channel management with invoices\n\nHave you actually tried it? It's an incredibly delighting experience."}