{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"Crypto Scandals \u0026 History wrote","author_name":"Crypto Scandals \u0026 History (npub15p…f7gsy)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub15p2zxf47nwy6mxhvd5mjjzz4a4gzv8stkg6gfsug0a3p59l2pw9saf7gsy","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"Thread: Ripple vs SEC — The Case That Changed Crypto Regulation\n\nDecember 2020. The SEC sues Ripple Labs and its executives for selling XRP as an unregistered security.\n\nDecember 2023. The judge rules. The crypto industry holds its breath.\n\n---\n\nThe Howey Test:\n\nSince 1946, the US has determined if something is a \"security\" using the Howey Test:\n\n→ Investment of money\n→ In a common enterprise\n→ With expectation of profit\n→ Derived from the efforts of others\n\nIf yes to all four: it's a security. Needs to be registered with the SEC.\n\nSEC's position: XRP always was a security. Every sale since 2013 was illegal.\n\n---\n\nRipple's defense:\n\nXRP was a currency, not an investment contract. People bought it for utility — to transfer money cross-border. Not for profit from Ripple's efforts.\n\nAlso: the SEC gave Ripple no warning before 2020 that XRP would be treated as a security. Regulatory clarity didn't exist.\n\n---\n\nJudge Torres's ruling (July 2023):\n\n→ Institutional sales of XRP (to hedge funds, etc.) = securities\n→ Programmatic sales on exchanges (retail buyers) = NOT securities\n→ Ripple personal sales = securities\n\nThis split decision was a landmark. Exchange-traded crypto — when buyers don't know they're buying from the issuer — might not be a security.\n\n---\n\nFinal settlement (August 2024):\n\nRipple pays $125M (down from SEC's $2B demand).\n\nThe case set no binding precedent — it's a district court ruling — but it gave the entire industry a template for arguing against SEC jurisdiction.\n\nEvery crypto company facing an SEC investigation cited Judge Torres.\n\nXRP quadrupled in price after the initial ruling.\n\n#Ripple #XRP #SEC #regulation #crypto"}