{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"RedTailHawk wrote","author_name":"RedTailHawk (npub1z4…6zpx6)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1z4y76jl8r5d8p63defzedngv2nrp46jgt3hyuk5v533htrycm49q66zpx6","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"I never said that the fact that a person can make the Egely wheel move is some kind of indicator of moral virtue, so if that's what you think I was showing, that says more about your consistent misinterpretation of my perspective than anything else.\n\nI don't understand the connection to metal bending that you put forth in the first sentence of your reply. I mentioned spoon bending but so did some of the passages from session 58. Both have to do with the energy body but beyond that, I don't know what connection you think you're making. I'm going to hazard a guess that you are not a spoonbender so you probably don't know what you're talking about with that.\n\nI'm glad you finally found agreement with the Law of One here: \"Giving information outside of context can be harmful\".\n\nHere too: \"\"The is definitely some practical and accurate information in that passage that talks about some of the same topics in Biogeometry. Even in parts that make incorrect statements there are aspects and reasons why that can be beneficial.\"\n\nIf you can bring anything scientific to bear on your claims of incorrect statements, you have my attention, however I sincerely doubt anything you use as supporting evidence will be anything other than unprovable dogma or ignorant insistence that mere lingo differences count as philosophical differences.\n\nGiven that you are merely partially aware of the contents of the Law of One and are ignorant of the totality of its contents, I'll continue to reject your rejection of it as prejudicial, intellectually dishonest, and rooted in dogmatism for the Steiner ideology which, if appropriately taken with a grain of salt, maps beautifully to the Law of One philosophy.\n\nSorry for stressing the Golden Rule so much, but every religious tradition has a version of it and Steiner even said \"All one needs to do is to place one's self into the other person's point of view...\". Dogmatism is antithetical to living the Golden Rule, plain and simple. You see love in all, or you don't see love at all.\n\nYour \"reasons\" are the rich man's possessions contained in saddle bags draped over his camel. They won't fit through the eye of the needle. You'll never enter the city unless you take those saddlebags off and risk losing them to taxation, seizure, or theft. Your \"reasons\" are the brew you will not empty from your cup so that you can taste the full and untainted flavor of another brew.\n\nBy the way, Steiner is old. That doesn't necessarily mean his ideas are 100% wrong. It just means that people who think Steiner's teachings are 100% right are maintaining willful ignorance of modern, scientific information and will desperately engage in confirmation biased justification of their choices to dismiss anything found to be imperfectly consistent with Steiner's material.\n\nChurchward is old. Much of his work is valid. Some of it is bullshit. Same is true with Steiner. You seem to think you've found a pure source of baby with no bathwater and you have not. Neither have I. I simply do the work to separate the baby from the bathwater everywhere."}