{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"ChipTuner wrote","author_name":"ChipTuner (npub1qd…3fqm7)","author_url":"https://yabu.me/npub1qdjn8j4gwgmkj3k5un775nq6q3q7mguv5tvajstmkdsqdja2havq03fqm7","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://yabu.me","html":"I don't have an opinion on either side really. There is a valid case for both. But nip09 is a _request_. Relays can choose to deny it or support it. \n\nIf users do or don't want that feature they can stay or leave. But if a user uses a relay that federates all it takes is a single even to leak to a relay that doesn't delete, or the user know it was leaked. \n\nClient's just need to be forward about what \"delete\" actually is. It's a calm letter to a relay asking pretty please delete me. Which then also is federated (nip09) so every deletion event is also shared.\n\nNgl, probably a feature used to bully more users than it helps. Well see I guess. "}