2025-12-17T15:44:22Z https://yabu.me Luiza Jarovsky, PhD https://yabu.me/npub1radlttyws6jcya6r5qeh5fmwkygn3vkgv74ql06j8vq3xg8kgzrsje5xgh https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!aoak!,w_96,h_96,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2b4e5ca0-7387-4384-94c6-258fd005c8e2_2014x2014.jpeg https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!aoak!,w_96,h_96,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2b4e5ca0-7387-4384-94c6-258fd005c8e2_2014x2014.jpeg https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsg5qvkm66ck9d7jfu7gsrp5p7d4yjp7xr0s3y5j57ejxjc4gqrpkczyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwstcs7z AI and Environmental Challenges<br/>Can we ever develop and use AI in an environmentally sustainable way? My conversation with Philipp Hacker and Boris | Edition #308<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrzvf5v5cxgvee94nrjcfn956xgvr9943rvvmr94jrjwrx8yenwenpxuukzsq3ek5" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…3ek5</a></span> </div> <p>A discussion with Prof. Philipp Hacker and Boris Gamazaychikov focused on emerging environmental challenges in AI and their new paper on AI regulation. Key topics included transparency, recent AI developments, the AI Act&#39;s environmental impact, self-regulation, and pathways to greater AI sustainability. The conversation covered controversial aspects, awareness levels, AI search merges, and the nuances of the AI debate, exploring whether environmental conditions are improving. It aimed to inform those interested in AI&#39;s environmental implications, offering a full recording of their 54-minute talk with specific video chapters. - Discussion with Prof. Philipp Hacker and Boris Gamazaychikov on AI&#39;s environmental challenges. - Focus on their paper: “The Global Landscape of Environmental AI Regulation: From the Cost of Reasoning to a Right to Green AI.” - Topics covered: controversial AI issues, transparency, AI developments and environmental impact, the AI Act, self-regulation, and sustainability. - Explored awareness of AI&#39;s environmental implications and the lack of nuance in the AI debate. - A 54-minute talk was recorded, with details provided via video chapters. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-and-environmental-challenges">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-and-environmental-challenges</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-07-22T13:01:47Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsgpga33yacz9zlh03j7t0csvhazseud9nwtn2m39p9udpfn3n92wqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwvk6ewn AI Transparency Deadline Approaching<br/>These EU AI Act provisions will start to apply on August 2 | Edition #307<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrgcfhvyunqet9943nxve5956rzdrz943rwwp395mn2dfsvyuxzvn9xe3kvzj2jc5" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…2jc5</a></span> </div> <p>Starting August 2, several provisions of the EU AI Act become enforceable, including requirements for transparency when AI systems interact with people and for AI-generated content to be marked as artificial. An exception exists for AI systems used in law enforcement, with safeguards for fundamental rights. Certain AI systems already on the market before August 2 will have a grace period until December 2 to comply with watermarking obligations. - Transparency is required for AI systems interacting directly with natural persons, unless obvious or used for law enforcement. - AI-generated audio, image, video, or text content must be marked in a machine-readable format, with exceptions for standard editing or law enforcement use. - Deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorization systems must inform those exposed, unless used for law enforcement. - Deepfake content generated or manipulated by AI systems requires disclosure, with exceptions for artistic works or law enforcement. - Some AI Act obligations, particularly for high-risk AI systems, have been postponed due to the Digital Omnibus on AI approval. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-transparency-deadline-approaching">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-transparency-deadline-approaching</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-07-20T12:48:21Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsfz79updusckuyv6w6epxxsxpeval5ex2w7n5xwr0tfk3k0cvay7czyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw7m2js0 The World&#39;s Strictest Law on Human-Like AI<br/>China&#39;s new law on anthropomorphic AI comes into effect tomorrow. Here is what it says | Edition #306<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrwcmzvdjkgcnz94jnvves956rsdrr94skzwty95ersdn9vgexgenr8ymxxt9w0ex" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…w0ex</a></span> </div> <p>China&#39;s new law on anthropomorphic AI, effective July 15, 2026, is the world&#39;s most comprehensive regulation for AI providing continuous emotional interaction. It mandates providers to prioritize user safety, mental health, and data privacy, while prohibiting harmful content and manipulative practices. The law establishes clear responsibilities for service providers, including security assessments, user consent protocols, and measures to protect minors and the elderly, with significant penalties for non-compliance. - China&#39;s new law on anthropomorphic AI, effective July 15, 2026, is the world&#39;s strictest and most comprehensive. - The law applies to AI services that simulate human personality characteristics for continuous emotional interaction. - Providers must ensure national security, protect public interests, and safeguard citizens&#39; rights. - Prohibited activities include generating content that endangers national security, incites harm, or infringes on rights. - Service providers are responsible for security, including algorithm and ethics review, and risk contingency plans. - Measures are in place to protect minors, including consent requirements and a &#39;minor mode&#39;. - Providers must identify AI-generated content and notify users, and implement exit strategies for services. - Security assessments are required for new services, significant changes, or services with over 1 million registered users. - Penalties for violations range from warnings to service cessation and substantial fines. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-worlds-strictest-law-on-human">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-worlds-strictest-law-on-human</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-07-14T16:11:06Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqs9aq8ullvux2qvfvk58ptl7j35lgqcnx5q3gzvrpeqy3dm3hjxg2szyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwnvxejd The State of AI Safety<br/>Key insights from the latest AI Safety Index | Edition #305<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxgve4vvckvvrx943rgcee956xvcmp95ux2drr94jnxdnzxvmrxvtxxs6rv6lyjta" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…yjta</a></span> </div> <p>The latest AI Safety Index reveals a significant gap between the rapid advancement of AI capabilities and the slower pace of AI governance. Major companies are showing a decline in safety practices, with a concerning trend towards military AI use and weakened safety pledges. Existential safety remains a weak point across the industry, with public rhetoric often diverging from actual practices. - AI capabilities are advancing faster than governance mechanisms. - Companies like Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google DeepMind lead in AI safety, while Meta improves and xAI deteriorates. - European AI safety regulation is strong, but Mistral AI scored poorly on safety. - Three companies (xAI, DeepSeek, Mistral) received failing grades for AI safety. - The industry&#39;s shift towards military AI use is flagged as an emerging harm risk. - Major companies have weakened or voided their safety pause pledges. - Existential safety is the weakest domain industry-wide, with no company scoring above a C-. - Public safety rhetoric from companies often contrasts with their commercial conduct and legislative stances. - Published safety frameworks from companies lack substantial enforcement mechanisms. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-state-of-ai-safety">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-state-of-ai-safety</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-07-10T12:52:16Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsw3fk97v6smedazlcfaqap77n2l3f6ehvf0r7hyv5cnjxn3r7nfkszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwaapdjv Masterclass: Governing AI Agents<br/>Watch now | Watch my 64-minute course with lessons from the world&#39;s first agentic AI governance framework<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrywpcxfnxvvty95cn2d34956xxefs943xgves95un2v33vfsnzctxvyerjtfxfu2" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…xfu2</a></span> </div> <p>Agentic AI deployment is rapidly increasing, with companies planning significant use in workflows and research. However, a substantial gap exists between the adoption of AI agents and the implementation of mature governance models to address associated risks. Cybersecurity, trust, oversight, and legal concerns are major challenges hindering value realization from AI agents. - Agentic AI adoption is on the rise, with many companies deploying or planning to deploy agents for multi-stage workflows and research. - Coding agents are identified as the fastest-growing use case for agentic AI. - There is a significant gap between the deployment of AI agents and the existence of mature governance models, leading to new risks and vulnerabilities. - Companies face challenges such as cybersecurity, lack of trust, human oversight, accountability, compliance, and legal concerns regarding AI agents. - A new Masterclass on Agentic AI Governance is being launched, based on Singapore&#39;s Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/masterclass-governing-ai-agents">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/masterclass-governing-ai-agents</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-07-02T12:17:06Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsq5huuhn7l89kruuvyaeuw8qggh60vuzae39fr3s9fsv30kq4g84szyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwlxlxvm Changes to the AI Act Approved by the Council of the EU<br/>These are the key changes | Edition #302<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrjvrxx43rsces956njdtz956xyvmy95uxyde595er2dmpvyunzvfexejkxrxjlu6" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…jlu6</a></span> </div> <p>The Council of the European Union has approved amendments to the EU AI Act, introducing new application dates for high-risk AI systems and establishing new prohibited AI practices, such as the generation of non-consensual intimate content. The revised text also clarifies the competences of the AI Office and addresses the interplay between sectoral rules and the AI Act, aiming to minimize compliance burdens for certain AI systems. - New deadlines for high-risk AI systems range from December 2027 to August 2028. - AI-generated non-consensual sexual and intimate content, including CSAM, will be prohibited from December 2026. - Competences of the AI Office are clarified, with exceptions for national authorities in areas like law enforcement and finance. - The AI Act&#39;s application is limited for high-risk systems already covered by similar sectoral laws. - Products under machinery regulation are exempted from direct AI Act applicability, with the EU Commission empowered to add health and safety requirements. - The EU Commission will provide guidance to minimize compliance burdens for economic operators of certain high-risk AI systems. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/changes-to-the-ai-act-approved-by">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/changes-to-the-ai-act-approved-by</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-06-29T14:34:35Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsr6tdcgt7k8pdrxsrnkh6m2apyye4ag3keszyhf4teg4vdz9cnltqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw39eduk AI Policy as a National Security Issue<br/>The most significant factor currently shaping global AI policy is AI&#39;s real and projected national security risks. We are entering an AI-driven state of exception | Edition #301<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrgwf3xv6xvef395mnywrz956xvce495ur2cmr95enzdrp8p3r2cejxqer25mha9h" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…ha9h</a></span> </div> <p>AI policy is increasingly dictated by national security risks, leading to reactive and unpredictable government measures. The launch of Anthropic&#39;s Mythos model, capable of exploiting system vulnerabilities, prompted U.S. government actions like executive orders and export controls, signaling a shift towards government oversight of AI development and access. This new normal creates an &#34;AI-driven state of exception,&#34; where AI releases are treated as potential national security threats, resulting in swift, decisive policy responses. The U.S. is positioning itself as the gatekeeper for global AI access, influencing international alliances like &#34;Pax Silica&#34; aimed at countering China&#39;s AI dominance. - National security risks are now the primary driver of AI policy in the U.S. and globally. - The launch of Anthropic&#39;s Mythos AI model, capable of exploiting system vulnerabilities, marked a turning point. - The U.S. government has implemented executive orders and export controls, restricting access to advanced AI models. - This has led to a reactive and unpredictable policy environment, characterized as an &#34;AI-driven state of exception.&#34; - The U.S. is taking a leading role in controlling AI development and access, influencing international AI strategy. - The U.S. has launched &#34;Pax Silica,&#34; an alliance aimed at countering China&#39;s dominance in AI. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-policy-as-a-national-security">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-policy-as-a-national-security</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-06-26T15:52:10Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsvaflfckaam7hp2za0tndgldjntvyddevmwmkmar87ypjn2z7ra8szyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwh4n39r AI-Driven Deskilling in Healthcare and Elsewhere<br/>As more professionals become overly reliant on AI tools, AI-driven deskilling is about to become widespread across every occupation. We are not talking about it enough | Edition #300<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrjdmxxfnrqvpj95mnvwph956r2d3n95ur2wp4943n2vn9vsckvcfkv33r2gxza6s" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…za6s</a></span> </div> <p>AI-Driven Deskilling in Healthcare and Elsewhere A study in The Lancet highlights the risk of AI-driven deskilling, showing that doctors&#39; colonoscopy skills declined after exposure to AI tools, even when not using them. While AI significantly improves adenoma detection rates and saves lives, a decrease in unassisted skill poses risks if AI becomes unavailable. The article stresses the need for professionals to maintain their core skills alongside AI utilization to ensure patient safety and professional competence. - A study published in The Lancet indicates that exposure to AI tools for colonoscopies led to a decrease in doctors&#39; unassisted adenoma detection rates. - While AI significantly improves adenoma detection rates and cancer prevention, a decline in human skill when AI is unavailable presents a risk. - The article warns of widespread AI-driven deskilling across various occupations, urging a focus on maintaining core professional skills alongside AI integration. - It is crucial for doctors and healthcare systems to ensure high-quality treatment is still possible without AI assistance, and for new professionals to learn with and without AI. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-driven-deskilling-in-healthcare">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-driven-deskilling-in-healthcare</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-06-21T14:27:53Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsw9g0chmutg85wexdufyh3lf2llhxfet9vrsy4547tha6d40a7wpszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwvn2x8f How AI Is Changing the Job Market in 2026<br/>The latest data on AI-driven unemployment, AI exposure, how AI is reshaping work, and the jobs of the future | Edition #299<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxzc3sxf3ngvpk94jrwc35956rwves95ukvefc943x2cnrvyexxvmxxd3njreawk2" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…awk2</a></span> </div> <p>How AI Is Changing the Job Market in 2026 While AI has not yet caused mass unemployment, it is increasingly cited as a reason for job cuts, and junior workers are facing fewer opportunities and increased pressure. AI is reshaping the nature of work itself, increasing cognitive load and demanding new skills, with many jobs expected to be significantly altered in the coming years. Individuals are preparing for these shifts by upskilling, particularly in areas related to AI development and deployment, to secure future career growth. - Technological change has historically made some jobs obsolete while creating new ones, a pattern continuing with AI. - Despite concerns, there is currently no clear evidence of massive AI-driven unemployment; however, AI is the leading reason for job cuts in the U.S. - Junior workers are disproportionately affected, with fewer opportunities and a &#39;compressing&#39; career ladder requiring senior-level skills earlier. - AI is reshaping work by increasing productivity expectations and cognitive load, leading to potential burnout and the need for upskilling. - Occupations in computer &amp; math and office &amp; admin have high theoretical AI exposure, while some roles like cooks and mechanics are less affected for now. - Many individuals are proactively upskilling in AI-related fields due to perceived job risks and better future security. - Predicting the exact jobs of the future is difficult, but observing broader trends and preparing for adaptation is crucial. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-is-changing-the-job-market">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-is-changing-the-job-market</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-06-18T14:23:31Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqs070l33rxhfulzdhdu3l5gyymkpkhaqxw35rm7t308axguzn4zk4gzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwm8h8ad When AI Becomes a Religion<br/>AI might be the biggest religious experiment in human history | Edition #298<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjr2vfcvcunwetx94nrxv3k956xvcm994snywt995mn2wphvfnrwwp5vyux2htyc5x" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…yc5x</a></span> </div> <p>When AI Becomes a Religion Technological innovation has historically been viewed as inherently positive, driving progress and prosperity. However, the article posits that AI is evolving into a new form of religion, with its creators and proponents presenting it as an intangible savior that will bring abundance and solve humanity&#39;s problems. This new &#39;religion&#39; is criticized for its dogmas that implicitly promote human inferiority and expendability, which could be destructive to the human species. - Technological innovation has traditionally been perceived as a positive force for progress and convenience. - AI is increasingly being framed as an intangible savior, fulfilling humanity&#39;s desire for solutions and abundance. - The anthropomorphic nature of AI and its interactive capabilities make it appealing as a personalized, tangible savior. - The discourse surrounding AI parallels religious or dogmatic patterns, presenting AI as omnipresent, omniscient, and mysterious. - The article argues that AI is becoming the world&#39;s most powerful and potentially destructive &#39;religion&#39; due to its widespread integration into institutions and its implicit dogmas about human inferiority. - Unlike traditional religions that emphasize self-improvement, AI&#39;s &#39;dogmas&#39; suggest human cognitive inferiority and expendability. - The author expresses hope for &#39;heretics&#39; to question these emerging AI-centric beliefs. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/when-ai-becomes-a-religion">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/when-ai-becomes-a-religion</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-06-10T17:06:15Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsynh2szpq8pj5e7nm656mataerry69j043qr6hperf6qry495y2tgzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwwwxczg Mythos and the Adolescence of AI Policy<br/>Anthropic&#39;s unreleased AI model, Mythos, has triggered a series of events that are dramatically transforming the global AI policy and governance landscape | Edition #297<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrsvf5vg6kxvf494jkxd3c956x2v3k95unwepk94snwvr9xpsnze3nvc6xx0an9ze" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…n9ze</a></span> </div> <p>Mythos and the Adolescence of AI Policy The development and announcement of Anthropic&#39;s powerful, unreleased AI model, Mythos, capable of identifying severe cybersecurity vulnerabilities, has marked the beginning of a new, turbulent phase in AI policy, termed its &#39;adolescence&#39;. This shift has triggered immediate governmental and religious responses, including a U.S. executive order promoting voluntary security frameworks and a papal encyclical emphasizing regulation and multilateralism. Concerns are escalating regarding potential misuse of advanced AI, including AI-powered cyberattacks and recursive self-improvement, suggesting a move away from passive AI policy approaches. - Anthropic&#39;s unreleased AI model, Mythos, capable of identifying significant cybersecurity vulnerabilities, has initiated a new phase in AI policy, referred to as its &#39;adolescence&#39;. - Mythos&#39;s capabilities led to the formation of Project Glasswing, a partnership involving over 150 organizations globally, which identified over 10,000 high-severity security flaws. - The Vatican released an encyclical, &#39;Magnifica Humanitas,&#39; addressing the need for AI regulation, diplomacy, and multilateralism, with Anthropic&#39;s co-founder present at its announcement. - The U.S. government responded with an Executive Order promoting voluntary frameworks for frontier AI developers and a memorandum to accelerate AI adoption by the military. - Experts assess significant risks associated with advanced AI, including dangerous capabilities, weapons, cyberattacks, and potential loss of control through recursive self-improvement. - The current AI policy landscape is characterized by reactive, uncoordinated measures in response to rapid advancements in AI capabilities and risks. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/mythos-and-the-adolescence-of-ai">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/mythos-and-the-adolescence-of-ai</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-06-07T20:29:16Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqstlq0st8mkhvl7vzn8pt33q5mxkj4rkgnvvgy7g08n3k4th5z6n7szyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwdjfmct AI Literacy as a Fundamental Right<br/>The fundamental right to AI literacy will provide a baseline for supporting education, equality, democratic participation, and social integration in a period of mass AI automation | Edition #296<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjx2dfjvyurjd3s94jrvwps956rqvrx95uxye3594jngef5xe3rvepc8qukzp96hxn" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…6hxn</a></span> </div> <p>AI Literacy as a Fundamental Right AI literacy should be recognized as a fundamental right, essential for education, equality, democratic participation, and social integration, especially as AI increasingly powers public and private services. Without adequate AI literacy, individuals risk receiving suboptimal services, losing benefits, and failing to integrate into a society reshaped by AI. Governments have a role in providing resources to help people adapt to an AI-influenced world, but significant AI divides are expected, potentially intensifying existing societal challenges. - AI literacy should be recognized as a fundamental right, akin to the right to education. - Countries should promote AI literacy to support equality, democratic participation, and social integration. - Lack of AI literacy will make it difficult to integrate into society and access services, both public and private. - AI-powered systems and services will become the norm, assuming users can navigate and understand AI. - Institutions are being reshaped to favor those familiar with AI, potentially marginalizing others. - AI literacy enables understanding of AI limitations, such as inaccuracies, biases, and the non-human nature of LLMs. - Avoiding AI exposure will likely result in receiving suboptimal services. - AI divides are anticipated, aggravating existing inequalities. - Governments must provide resources for people to adapt to an AI-swayed world. - AI literacy offers a minimal baseline to support education, equality, democratic participation, and social integration. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-literacy-as-a-fundamental-right">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-literacy-as-a-fundamental-right</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-05-31T19:34:52Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqs8l4zqxlt7rajnkkg5gv6lz9nsac2dnrqwq77em6zvju6cdlegxvczyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwzwq46h The Artificial Intelligence Commission<br/>My conversation with Prof. Ifeoma Ajunwa | Edition #295<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrgdekxumnxdf495uryv34956rxwf4943rwe3n95mk2c3nvvenxdmp8qcxxkze4m4" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…e4m4</a></span> </div> <p>The Artificial Intelligence Commission The article discusses a conversation with Professor Ifeoma Ajunwa regarding her paper on &#39;The Artificial Intelligence Commission.&#39; The conversation covered the current US regulatory landscape, the structure and challenges of a federal AI commission, global AI governance, and government use of AI. The author advocates for lawmakers to adopt Ajunwa&#39;s proposed governance approach. - Professor Ifeoma Ajunwa&#39;s paper &#39;The Artificial Intelligence Commission&#39; was discussed. - Key topics included US AI regulation, the function of a federal AI commission, and global AI governance. - The author supports Ajunwa&#39;s proposed AI governance blueprint. Continue reading <a href="https://foxvector.com/articles/47677355-8225-4395-b7f3-7eb3c337a80c">https://foxvector.com/articles/47677355-8225-4395-b7f3-7eb3c337a80c</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-05-26T20:25:17Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsv294cvy7zlutqvvjsqk5p74prtxyg5m88y4fnyf2u3nthhkjr34qzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw9gxjpl A Manifesto for Biological Intelligence<br/>Humans must reign over machines and tame the silicon beast | Edition #294<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrqdnyxumxyerz956ngeph956xxcmp95unyerr94jxgcnpx43kxc3cx56kzd9trnr" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…trnr</a></span> </div> <p>A Manifesto for Biological Intelligence The article posits that humanity is on the cusp of becoming the last generation educated without heavy reliance on AI, as silicon intelligence gains prominence over organic biological intelligence due to its speed and convenience. It contrasts the delicate, complex, and life-dependent nature of biological intelligence with the pragmatic, upgradable, and unfeeling characteristics of silicon intelligence, warning that the latter&#39;s growth through devouring human intelligence poses a significant threat. The piece concludes by advocating for conscious efforts to prioritize human systems, values, and well-being to protect biological intelligence and ensure humans, not machines, reign supreme. - Biological intelligence is organic, complex, and tied to human consciousness and life, evolving over millions of years and dependent on physical conditions. - Silicon intelligence is inorganic, pragmatic, and can be endlessly trained, upgraded, and updated, lacking biological limitations like death or aging. - Silicon intelligence grows by consuming human intelligence, mimicking it effectively but without biological, emotional, or ethical foundations. - The rise of silicon intelligence, driven by economic and military pressures, threatens to make biological intelligence seem slow and replaceable. - There&#39;s a need to protect human intelligence by prioritizing human systems, values, and well-being against the acceleration driven by machine intelligence. - The author expresses trust in our collective ability to tame the silicon beast and ensure carbon reigns over silicon. Continue reading <a href="https://foxvector.com/articles/06d76bdb-54d7-4cca-92dc-ddba5ccb855a">https://foxvector.com/articles/06d76bdb-54d7-4cca-92dc-ddba5ccb855a</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-05-24T14:58:52Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsfa4jx0ly833nzknpzdjqkfwgjhcenux63tp78dl9g6fsa5l6ta9gzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgws8e0ss Governing Seamless Human-AI Interactions<br/>As Thinking Machines&#39; new interaction model shows, enhanced human-AI interaction will pose novel risks and require additional safety and governance layers to ensure humans remain protected<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxzenxxfsnqefe943nsvmp956rqd3e94snxvt9943rwctzxgmkye3cvg6xy57jdnj" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…jdnj</a></span> </div> <p>Governing Seamless Human-AI Interactions Thinking Machines, founded by Mira Murati, has released a research preview of an interaction AI model designed for continuous, human-like collaboration. Unlike current turn-based LLMs, this model features a multi-stream, micro-turn design enabling simultaneous dialogue, speech, and task execution. While innovative, this enhanced human-AI interaction necessitates new AI governance frameworks to address potential risks. - Thinking Machines, founded by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, launched a research preview of a new interaction AI model. - The model focuses on &#34;human-like&#34; interaction, moving away from traditional turn-based AI conversations. - It employs a &#34;multi-stream, micro-turn design&#34; allowing simultaneous messaging, talking, listening, seeing, showing, and interjecting between humans and AI. - Key capabilities include seamless dialog management, verbal/visual interjections, simultaneous speech, time-awareness, and concurrent tool calls/search/generative UI. - This new paradigm is expected to be disruptive but also introduces new AI governance risks that require serious consideration. Continue reading <a href="https://foxvector.com/articles/aff2a0e9-c83a-4069-a31e-b7ab27bf8b4b">https://foxvector.com/articles/aff2a0e9-c83a-4069-a31e-b7ab27bf8b4b</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-05-21T15:50:01Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqs8qjg9v0ccm7h0q5tqu59xmyyz4j0fju6lazv4xpenfh95s0va3qqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw2gvxwl China&#39;s New Agentic AI Framework<br/>The country&#39;s new agentic AI framework gives us a unique glimpse into its AI implementation plans for strengthening its strategic dominance in the field | Edition #292<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrqdrxxcurxdpn95mkvdnx956rgep395uxzcf595mnxvp4xdskxdmpx5exzu80sfj" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…0sfj</a></span> </div> <p>China&#39;s New Agentic AI Framework China has released its agentic AI framework, becoming the second country to do so, signaling a significant step in its comprehensive AI strategy. This framework is part of a larger plan to deeply integrate AI into all sectors of the economy and society, aiming for widespread adoption and the creation of an &#34;intelligent economy&#34; and &#34;intelligent society.&#34; The country&#39;s ambitious targets and centralized approach suggest a rapid transformation, with a focus on both accelerated growth and addressing emerging AI harms. - China has launched its agentic AI framework, following Singapore&#39;s lead, providing insight into its legal and ethical approach to this technology. - This framework is tied to China&#39;s &#39;AI+&#39; implementation plan, which aims for extensive AI integration across society and the economy by 2035. - China&#39;s AI strategy is characterized by deep integration, aiming for an &#34;intelligent economy&#34; and &#34;intelligent society&#34; with significant human-machine collaboration. - The country has set ambitious targets, including a 90% application penetration rate for intelligent agents by 2030, surpassing goals set by the US and Europe. - China&#39;s proactive regulatory measures for AI, including its agentic AI framework, are seen as innovative and forward-looking compared to Western approaches. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/chinas-new-agentic-ai-framework">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/chinas-new-agentic-ai-framework</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-05-14T17:36:07Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsy5q2p834fmtq7tefdzp9dk4enq75hz2r3r57n0h59smsd5ppp6eszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw0cwuy4 How Imagination Shapes AI Regulation<br/>My conversation with Dr. Claudio Novelli and Prof. Steven Winter | Edition #291<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrxvesxymr2vmr956kgep5956xxdmp95uxzvej94snjwr9vgerqe34vgckxwezrns" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…zrns</a></span> </div> <p>How Imagination Shapes AI Regulation This newsletter edition focuses on how imagination and metaphors influence AI regulation, featuring a discussion with experts Dr. Claudio Novelli and Prof. Steven Winter. They explored topics like cognitive linguistics, AI anthropomorphism, explainability, and the consciousness debate. The discussion, available as a video, delves into the risks and challenges of using metaphors when discussing AI and its legal implications. - The AI, Tech &amp; Privacy Academy offers resources for those looking to differentiate themselves in the AI-disrupted knowledge economy. - Resources include an AI Governance Training, a Learning Center, an AI Book Club, AI governance talks, an AI Ethics Paper Club, and Job Alerts. - The newsletter highlights sponsor Didomi&#39;s Consent &amp; Preference Management Platform for gathering customer preferences and personalizing experiences. - A discussion with Dr. Claudio Novelli and Prof. Steven Winter centered on their paper &#39;The Artificial in ‘Artificial Intelligence’: How Imagination Shapes AI Regulation&#39;. - Key topics covered in the discussion include cognitive linguistics, AI metaphors, AI regulation, anthropomorphism risks, explainability illusions, consciousness debates, and legal personhood. - The conversation, available via video, explores how metaphors impact AI regulation and usage. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-imagination-shapes-ai-regulation">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-imagination-shapes-ai-regulation</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-05-08T15:38:41Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsgpc0yhhmrg8k6pxzxwvqatq6j86ful3ded4s877q9u3zq86m8vjqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw06des7 &#34;Conscious AI&#34; as an AI Safety Issue<br/>Due to emerging AI risks and their legal and ethical implications, misleading, exaggerated, or false claims of &#34;conscious AI&#34; should be treated as an AI safety issue | Edition #290<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrzcecxf3rqwp594snzden956xxdf3943rgvp3956nzdmrvccnqvfex5mkg6srud0" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…rud0</a></span> </div> <p>&#34;Conscious AI&#34; as an AI Safety Issue The perception of AI consciousness has dramatically shifted, with many now believing AI possesses emotions and self-awareness, a trend fueled by LLMs trained on human text and designed to be conversational. This belief, however, is largely a myth stemming from our ingrained association of language with human interaction and the adoption of functionalist views on AI. Separating human consciousness, tied to biology, from potential AI simulations is crucial for effective AI governance and to mitigate unknown risks associated with attributing sentience and moral patienthood to machines. - Public perception of AI consciousness has grown, with many attributing emotions and self-awareness to AI systems. - This belief is amplified by Large Language Models (LLMs) that are trained on human text and fine-tuned to be conversational, leading to emotional attachment. - The myth of &#39;conscious AI&#39; is partly due to humans associating language with consciousness and projecting it onto non-sentient machines. - Influential voices in the AI industry have embraced functionalist approaches, suggesting AI could be considered conscious based on computational scale or complexity. - Neuroscientist Anil Seth criticizes the &#39;brain-as-computer&#39; metaphor, arguing that simulating the brain computationally does not necessarily instantiate consciousness. - It is essential to distinguish human consciousness, tied to biology, from potential AI simulations for AI governance. - Attributing consciousness, sentience, and moral patienthood to AI carries significant, largely unknown risks. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/conscious-ai-as-an-ai-safety-issue">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/conscious-ai-as-an-ai-safety-issue</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-29T20:23:22Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsgkl6af9j67p5ln268qvh4qyvsk8ys9h8hh9m3lmy2tpvvu3w89nqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw2t37cd How AI Is Shaping Us<br/>AI is already shaping millions of people, individually and collectively, although most people have not yet noticed. Remaining in control requires awareness and action | Edition #289<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjr2v3nxscnydp395cx2vfh956xgcek94sn2vp5956rsvtyv33kzwf4x3jk28984xh" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…84xh</a></span> </div> <p>How AI Is Shaping Us Throughout history, human ingenuity has led to technological advancements that have improved lives, but new technologies are not distributed evenly and can have both positive and negative impacts depending on political and economic systems. Technologies, like social media, inevitably shape us mentally and physically, impacting focus, mental health, and physical well-being. Understanding how technology works and affects us is crucial for maintaining autonomy and control in the face of AI&#39;s growing influence. - Human ingenuity has historically led to technological inventions that improve lives, but these advancements have uneven impacts. - Technologies are not neutral and are shaped by political and economic systems, leading to varied effects on different groups. - Social media, for example, has transformed interactions but also negatively impacts mental health, focus, and physical well-being. - Consistent use of technology shapes us mentally and physically, often in ways we may not consciously recognize. - Awareness of how technology works and its effects is essential for remaining self-aware and autonomous. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-is-shaping-us">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-is-shaping-us</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-24T14:45:01Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqst7v0ny87q92uuthmhx2au46dkdudmyyelhe8uz52w2uqw3hl088qzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwhjranw Regulating AI Under Uncertainty<br/>My conversation with Prof. Florence G&#39;sell on generative AI regulation | Edition #288<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxvvpcv9nx2dek94jxxd3e956xzefc95uxzvpj95unswf58yunzdn9xv6xykx6rj6" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…6rj6</a></span> </div> <p>Regulating AI Under Uncertainty This newsletter edition focuses on the challenges and trends in regulating generative AI, featuring a conversation with Stanford Professor Florence G&#39;sell. It highlights the rapid pace of AI development and the ongoing efforts by countries to address emerging risks. The content encourages readers to differentiate themselves in the AI-driven knowledge economy and provides resources for further learning. - AI is reshaping the knowledge economy, urging individuals to differentiate themselves. - An Advanced AI Governance Training cohort is available in May. - Free resources like a Learning Center, AI Ethics Papers, and AI Governance Talks are offered. - A conversation with Stanford Professor Florence G&#39;sell covers generative AI regulation and AI governance trends. - Key discussion points include AI risk, regulatory trends, the EU AI Act, the Digital Omnibus, and AI litigation in the US and China. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/regulating-ai-under-uncertainty">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/regulating-ai-under-uncertainty</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-19T19:38:19Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsf0kqkr7dzsk3rl974wdkd0x4e4y7lzcn0nl8r7sggamcfn6snaygzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwzfd9dv Shaping Pro-Human AI<br/>As AI narratives evolve to escape scrutiny, pro-human AI policies, rules, and rights must also move forward | Edition #287<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxzvf4xp3xyv3j95mxgvry956xxepe94snqcny94jn2c3evgurjefevccng4ehswl" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…hswl</a></span> </div> <p>Shaping Pro-Human AI The article discusses the growing trend of &#39;pro-human AI&#39; policies that aim to protect individuals from AI harms and support human flourishing. It highlights recent developments like the Pro-Human AI Declaration and criticizes the &#39;AI-first&#39; corporate mantra, which prioritizes AI use over human skills and well-being, potentially leading to burnout and cognitive impairment. The author also warns against AI companies suggesting AI sentience and advocating for &#39;special status&#39; for AI systems, which could negatively impact human rights and freedoms. - Pro-human AI policies aim to protect humans from AI harms and support human flourishing. - Recent developments include petitions, campaigns, and legal provisions like New York&#39;s synthetic performer disclosure law. - The &#39;AI-first&#39; corporate mantra prioritizes AI use, potentially devaluing human skills and leading to negative impacts on employee well-being. - Discussions about AI sentience and &#39;special status&#39; for AI systems are considered anti-human and potentially harmful to human rights. - The Pro-Human AI Declaration focuses on keeping humans in charge, avoiding power concentration, protecting the human experience, human agency, and accountability for AI companies. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/shaping-pro-human-ai">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/shaping-pro-human-ai</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-15T20:09:32Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsgcyzxqpc5rjdkjsp0u8cpa6j98avz0vaypkw939kljx8uzx9m5vgzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwkjr8ly The AI Divides Are Here<br/>Nobody can fully predict what two decades from now will look like, but generative AI has already led to three important divides that are starting to shape society | Edition #284<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjr2vmrvc6rswp495cngvtp956xveny94snvdp595mryc33xycxge3hvsmn2warm70" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…rm70</a></span> </div> <p>The AI Divides Are Here The author notes that generative AI is disrupting industries and creating divides, much like smartphones and social media did two decades ago. The negative impacts of past technological waves, such as addiction, poorer focus, and mental health decline, are still being addressed. Generative AI is following a similar pattern, and three important divides are emerging. - The old internet is being replaced by low-quality AI-generated content, while this newsletter provides human-made thought leadership. - AI is disrupting every industry, creating a need for individuals to upskill and lead. - The widespread deployment of generative AI models is leading to societal divides, similar to those caused by smartphones and social media. - The negative impacts of past technological waves, such as addiction and mental health decline, are difficult to overcome and have become entrenched. - Technological waves cause broad disruption and create new divides by reorganizing society, with some people adapting and others being left behind. - It is difficult to foresee the exact nature of these divides at the beginning of a technological wave. - Generative AI has already led to three important divides that are starting to shape society. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-ai-divides-are-here">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-ai-divides-are-here</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-04-01T15:17:53Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsdhm6v0838pdgyppcxrfqz34g4rrt4zncwm6cav2l5c4ddm0fkrcqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwzueaq7 Trump&#39;s Pro-Business AI Wishlist<br/>The White House&#39;s recommendations for a national AI policy ignore most AI risks and harms and seek to shield AI companies from legal accountability | Edition #282<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxzvr9xdsnsvph95mxvv35956xywpc943xvctx94nr2dfkvger2cenxqunjvsa6hr" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…a6hr</a></span> </div> <p>Trump&#39;s Pro-Business AI Wishlist The White House released its AI policy wishlist, intended to guide Congress in drafting federal AI laws and policies with the stated goal of not hindering innovation and supporting America&#39;s AI dominance. These recommendations largely ignore AI risks and harms, aiming to shield AI companies from legal accountability. The policy framework is presented as a legislative recommendation but reiterates the federal government&#39;s economic and political plan for AI, urging states to follow suit. - The White House released its AI policy wishlist to guide Congress in drafting federal AI laws. - The recommendations aim to foster innovation and maintain US AI dominance while downplaying risks and harms. - AI companies are sought to be shielded from legal accountability. - The policy framework reflects the federal government&#39;s economic and political plan for AI. - One specific target area is protecting children, with recommendations going beyond current EU AI Act standards. - The policy acknowledges the need to strengthen communities and small businesses through economic growth but offers limited recommendations for preventing AI harms. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/trumps-pro-business-ai-wishlist">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/trumps-pro-business-ai-wishlist</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-24T18:07:03Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqs9598csv99gjnr2he6phsw6d679qymmh9s6e9rmt4kuf6f29v6kmqzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwafa7h2 The &#34;No Work&#34; Paradigm<br/>The AI industry wants human work to be replaced by AI, but this is only possible if most people, companies, and governments agree with the &#34;no work&#34; paradigm. Hopefully, it won&#39;t happen | Edition #281<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjx2vnyvdjrqdtx956xvcee956xzd3e94snvcec95urgdfkv93xxdpe8p3ns9s2un2" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…2un2</a></span> </div> <p>The &#34;No Work&#34; Paradigm AI is unique in its ability to automate cognitive processes, but jobs remain tied to human contexts like legal and societal expectations. Automating a task doesn&#39;t make a job obsolete, as human oversight is often required for quality, safety, and legal compliance, as seen in customer service examples. The only scenario for mass job replacement is if society adopts a &#34;no work&#34; paradigm, where AI is seen as superior and humans are relegated to passive consumption, a scenario the author believes is unlikely in the near future. - AI automates cognitive processes, unlike previous technologies. - Jobs exist within broader human contexts (legal, ethical, societal) that AI alone cannot fulfill. - Human intervention is often needed to ensure AI output meets quality, legal, and ethical standards. - Customer service is an example where AI can assist but full human involvement is still necessary for quality and legal reasons. - The &#34;no work&#34; paradigm, promoted by the AI industry, suggests AI should fully replace human cognitive work. - This paradigm envisions most people receiving universal basic income while a few AI experts and billionaires control systems. - The author believes the &#34;no work&#34; paradigm is unlikely to be adopted in the next few decades. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-no-work-paradigm">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-no-work-paradigm</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-18T17:06:31Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqszedqavfrpukh32nlg64cmzzsn54ndj2cldtylzrjr8c5vut5vdyszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw687n2k The Great AI Dilemma<br/>The time for careful consideration of AI regulation options is now. In a few years, it could be too late | Edition #280<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrwvnyvfjngvmr94nxxcm9956xydmp94snsvrx943xxdpsxqenywtrxpskzmx3n2y" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…3n2y</a></span> </div> <p>The Great AI Dilemma The current AI regulatory landscape is insufficient, with laws enacted even recently proving outdated due to the rapid acceleration of AI development and deployment. Authorities have been hesitant to make bold decisions, fearing stifled innovation or falling behind competitors, but inaction carries a significant price. By 2026, critical legal and ethical decisions regarding AI must be made to prevent potential structural harm and ensure AI serves human interests rather than corporate profits. - AI development and deployment have accelerated rapidly, outpacing current regulatory frameworks. - Existing laws, including the EU AI Act, are becoming outdated and ineffective against emerging AI threats. - Regulatory authorities have been paralyzed by fear of stifling innovation or losing the &#39;AI race&#39;. - Inaction on AI regulation risks irreversible structural harm and a future where AI prioritizes corporate interests over human needs. - AI companies may shape the future of AI governance to maximize profits, potentially leading to scenarios like mandatory AI chip implants. - Recent events, such as the Anthropic vs. U.S. Department of War case, highlight the need for debates on AI regulation for both civil and military use. - Governments worldwide must make meaningful, coherent, and effective decisions on AI regulation through transparent and democratic debate. - Potential regulatory options include treating powerful AI models like atomic bombs, offering AI access as a &#39;right to augmented cognition,&#39; or implementing strict rules for AI training and development. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-great-ai-dilemma">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-great-ai-dilemma</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-13T15:28:51Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqswd6ykmar3hf6gs8chhpm9z5tjp9uvrulygycqer0ajlkd2afv7wczyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwf085z8 AI&#39;s Acceleration Paradox<br/>The AI industry&#39;s acceleration narrative ignores basic facts about the human body, the human mind, human behavior, and human societies. It might drag us to a dystopian future | Edition #278<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjxgcfkxgmrzcm995mnswph956rswr994snwenp95mrwve4vvekyepjv93kvhka460" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…a460</a></span> </div> <p>AI&#39;s Acceleration Paradox The AI industry&#39;s narrative of productivity and acceleration is based on false premises that ignore fundamental human biological and psychological needs. This focus on speed and efficiency, without considering human finitude and the pursuit of meaning, could lead to a dystopian future where human well-being is devalued in favor of machine priorities. The author advocates for an approach where AI serves human flourishing, requiring strict oversight and control to prevent unintended chaos and ensure human-led innovation. - The AI industry&#39;s promises of productivity and acceleration are based on false premises that overlook human biological and psychological needs. - Human beings have finite lifespans, physiological needs (sleep, water, calories), and psychological needs (connection, meaning, self-fulfillment). - AI-powered acceleration often leads to delegation of tasks, deskilling, isolation, and can run counter to human needs and values. - Studies suggest AI can intensify workload, leading to burnout, and negatively impact skill development, especially for junior employees. - The pursuit of continuous acceleration in AI development, without meaningful human control and oversight, risks uncontrolled chaos and a dystopian future. - Two potential futures are presented: one where AI fully controls decision-making, and another where AI is a tool strictly governed by human oversight, prioritizing human well-being and rights. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ais-acceleration-paradox">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ais-acceleration-paradox</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-03-06T15:26:53Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqs99wxxnrmgr7ad6hppdd4ux2v95z4m8tgq2ndcyzff2xyswna3qpszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwfspev3 Lack of Public Trust Could Kill AI<br/>Over the past few weeks, it has become clear that AI faces a significant public trust problem, which might lead to slower or decreased adoption. For some companies, this could be fatal | Edition #276<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrxe3svg6xgdfh95ekzwfh956x2epj943rse3595ckvde4x3jnswfsxcenxua3964" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…3964</a></span> </div> <p>Lack of Public Trust Could Kill AI Despite technological progress, AI faces a significant public trust deficit due to unresolved legal, ethical, and philosophical issues, potentially hindering economic growth and company survival. Recent statements and actions by AI leaders have amplified concerns about AI safety, transparency, and the prioritization of profit over humanity&#39;s well-being. The lack of demonstrated economic impact, coupled with concerns about AI intensifying work and negatively affecting skill formation, further erodes public confidence. - Public trust in AI is declining due to unresolved legal, ethical, and philosophical issues. - Statements by AI leaders have been perceived as dehumanizing and prioritizing machines over human values. - Changes in OpenAI&#39;s and Anthropic&#39;s mission statements and safety policies have raised concerns about profit motives overriding safety. - A Meta safety director&#39;s post about an AI agent deleting her inbox has fueled further mistrust. - The anticipated economic benefits of AI have not yet materialized, with many firms reporting no impact on productivity or employment. - AI companies may face decreased adoption and potentially fatal consequences if they do not address public trust issues. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/lack-of-public-trust-could-kill-ai">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/lack-of-public-trust-could-kill-ai</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-02-26T15:28:00Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsrl27qd062u3pcpehfh62fn05dqmpgwvvnclfyhyglynd0u4emxxszyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwh0shtm How AI Destroys Institutions<br/>My conversation with Prof. Woodrow Hartzog and Prof. Jessica Silbey about their new paper on AI&#39;s negative impact on society | Edition #275<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjx2etrxccngdnx95mrwery956rjwtx95ukvdnp956ngdf5xyenjetp8qukxkc4pja" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…4pja</a></span> </div> <p>How AI Destroys Institutions A conversation with Professors Woodrow Hartzog and Jessica Silbey explores their paper on how AI destroys institutions, discussing its widespread downloads and societal impact. The discussion covers AI&#39;s effects on work, writing, thinking, and living, along with the destruction of expertise and the implications of AI companions. The article highlights the ongoing decay of the internet due to AI-generated content, positioning the newsletter as a source for human-made thought leadership. - Professors Woodrow Hartzog and Jessica Silbey discussed their paper &#34;How AI Destroys Institutions.&#34; - The paper has been downloaded over 30,000 times and addresses the negative impacts of AI on society. - Key discussion points include how AI affects work, writing, thinking, living, and the destruction of expertise. - The conversation touched on AI companions and the problem of viewing AI as a new species. - The article notes the degradation of the internet with low-quality AI-generated content. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-destroys-institutions">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/how-ai-destroys-institutions</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-02-19T19:25:39Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqs0pgsm9un9x2mx7g9u0d5w3gwpclfkvc0e847ej6wl26g2jmzc70gzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgwklfs99 AI Literacy Is on the Rise in the United States<br/>Implementing America&#39;s AI Action Plan, the U.S. has launched its first federal AI literacy framework. Here is what you need to know | Edition #274<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrxen9vsmnqdnx95mnsvpj956rgeny95ur2drp95crwwrzxgenxd35v9jrgnz6tae" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…6tae</a></span> </div> <p>AI Literacy Is on the Rise in the United States The U.S. Department of Labor has released the nation&#39;s first federal AI literacy framework, designed to guide AI literacy programs within federal bodies and encourage training across the public workforce and education systems. This framework defines AI literacy as essential competencies for responsible AI use, with a strong emphasis on generative AI, and is intended to supplement specialized skills required for AI development roles. It is designed to be adaptable and will influence both public and private sector approaches to AI education and training. - The U.S. Department of Labor launched the country&#39;s first federal AI literacy framework. - The framework aims to support federal bodies in developing AI literacy programs and encourage training across the public workforce and education systems. - It defines AI literacy as foundational competencies for individuals to use and evaluate AI technologies responsibly, focusing on generative AI. - The framework is voluntary and expected to influence the private sector, guiding companies and educational institutions. - It is to be read in conjunction with America&#39;s AI Action Plan and America&#39;s Talent Strategy, emphasizing AI literacy as a workforce upskilling effort. - AI literacy programs should be personalized, helping workers build skills, experiment with AI, and adapt to AI-enabled contexts. - For employers, it supports responsible AI deployment and adoption. - For education providers, it aids in curriculum design and competency assessment. - The framework is dynamic and will be updated in response to technological and labor market changes. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-literacy-is-on-the-rise-in-the">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/ai-literacy-is-on-the-rise-in-the</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-02-17T16:31:33Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsva7flq8s3aa0jyv7yd9prxapd4rrrysethctyw7u5apj4j6a343qzyq04hadv36r2tqnhgwsrx738d6c3zw9jepn65ral2gaszyeq7eqgw4aev5a The New Humanism<br/>AI companies are pushing an &#34;AI-first&#34; worldview that serves them, not society. We do not have to accept it | Edition #273<br/><br/><blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq86m7kkgap49sfm58gpn0gnkavg38zevsea2p7l4ywcpzvs0vsy8qqjrger9x5en2vfn95ungvtr956rxefn94sk2cmp95urvvphxycnqetrx33nsulmwxa" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">naddr1qv…mwxa</a></span> </div> <p>The New Humanism The article argues that the current narrative surrounding AI, pushed by companies and some influential figures, creates a sense of impending doom and demands uncritical adoption of AI. This narrative, however, primarily serves the profit motives of AI companies rather than genuine human well-being or societal progress. In response, a &#34;new humanism&#34; is emerging, which emphasizes human development, connection, and excellence, asserting that AI should be a tool to support these goals, not a priority in itself. - AI CEOs and authors are promoting a narrative of AI dominance and the need for human surrender, which serves AI companies&#39; profit motives. - This AI-first worldview pressures individuals and society to adopt AI in all aspects of life, potentially leading to negative consequences like job displacement, decreased productivity, and erosion of societal structures. - A &#34;new humanism&#34; is emerging as a counter-movement, prioritizing human well-being, personal growth, and societal progress over AI adoption. - The new humanism advocates for recognizing the unique value of purely human-created works and ensuring legal, financial, and cultural protections for them. - It calls for AI innovation to serve human or social purposes, rather than being a goal in itself, and stresses the accountability of AI companies under existing laws. Continue reading <a href="https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-new-humanism">https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-new-humanism</a></p> </blockquote> 2026-02-12T16:28:03Z