2026-04-07T12:44:22Z https://yabu.me Az1m0th https://yabu.me/npub1khzysj4chrpcem0ra6932z7h7grv2g5ndxu6y3wffrskkajryqsquag843 https://t00t.azimoth.de/system/accounts/avatars/115/690/966/616/169/040/original/6e365c202c6da6dc.png https://t00t.azimoth.de/system/accounts/avatars/115/690/966/616/169/040/original/6e365c202c6da6dc.png https://yabu.me/nevent1qqswgk4tgzvcgt9v8dzpn9wvh0afyfd8cltw6uj7trkqnv6eceyzncgzyz6ugjz2hzuv8r8du0hgk9gt6leqd3fzjd5mngj9e9ywz6mkgvszqf6p36r In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsdrknjayy6lww87ej20dq5fs9xy9kql00jul7gh4zgs89mjh4kygc0z9t4f'>nevent1q…9t4f</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>Yes, I think to pass up such an opportunity would&#39;ve been a grave mistake. As I said: I&#39;m not criticising. <br/>I read the discussion about unified attestation &amp; I do think centralization IS a problem.<br/>But: Unless Fairphone itself made statements attacking GrapheneOS that I don&#39;t know of, I don&#39;t see how supporting Iodé and Murena rules out a collaboration with gOS. So far FP couldn&#39;t build what gOS requires, so they couldn&#39;t partner with gOS. <br/>But if Motorola can ask, so can FP👍 2026-03-25T16:30:53Z https://yabu.me/nevent1qqsfxnjtwfkn38rzldn3zz44husemrq4er5gqsulyy6g45kcrgg3ruqzyz6ugjz2hzuv8r8du0hgk9gt6leqd3fzjd5mngj9e9ywz6mkgvszqgp0g72 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs8edyfnm8stl9fvek2ussnqu048tty4tff5zx69dj6c4rnm3fyj5c6hqsj2'>nevent1q…qsj2</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>how did you end up partnering with Motorola anyways? I don&#39;t want to criticise anything here, I&#39;m only still hoping to see GrapheneOS on Fairphone some day. I&#39;m well aware FP so far didn&#39;t meet your standards and I can see why you can&#39;t lower the bar here. But Motorolas devices so far didn&#39;t meet your standards either, and you help them changed that.<br/>Is partnering with FP in a similar way thinkable to guide them towards a FP that has everything needed for proper GrapheneOS support? 2026-03-25T10:43:50Z