Kusimulkku

Public Key

npub1ju828ju5vngaz730hxg7cnucuqwfca7raqylxu922v8l6s5nuc8sf6d65j

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsfwr4rew2xf5w30ghmny0vf7vwq8yuwlp7sz0nwz49xrlag2f7vrcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dstq7k28

Publishing to

saltivka.org

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Author Public Key

npub1ju828ju5vngaz730hxg7cnucuqwfca7raqylxu922v8l6s5nuc8sf6d65j

Show more details

Last Notes

2025-02-28 10:02:58 UTC

- reply

I just don't care for downstream projects on browsers, with software so critical I want to get the updates in as fast as possible. I know some of those mentioned in OP had issues with that in the past. And not much reason to anyway for me to switch, Firefox works perfectly fine for me, so there's not much added benefit.

2025-02-28 08:46:18 UTC

- reply

I use Firefox. I don't like the changes but I don't want to use any downstream browsers and I don't think any of the not-downstream alternatives do better.

2025-02-07 11:12:24 UTC

- reply

I'm sorry but where in my reply did you get those ideas?

2025-02-07 10:45:45 UTC

- reply

"Recruits"? The concern isn't people joining something, it's them agreeing with the message. Less obvious approach already works just fine (probably even better than direct approach) all over the world in selling the message and the hate, so if you think this mandatory year of jail will have much of an effect on that, I have a few other "tough on crime" approaches to sell to you. Might even declare War on Hate in style of War on Drugs.
As usual, people want tough and immediate measures, forgetting about a longer term approach and working to tackle the causes of why this messaging sells so well.
> I’m not sure why you think being less obvious is just as effective as being overt.
Oh I don't think it's just as effective. It's not as effective, it's even more so since it's easier to get people to agree if you start small and then drop hints slowly. Obvious approach will just drive people away. You don't start with "sieg heil kill all the untermensch ", you start with something small, saying how foreigners are stealing your jobs or making the housing market suck. Then you can guide them in the direction you want without ever saying it. And shit like that is almost impossible to go after in any sensible way, without a risk of punishing people on very questionable grounds.

2025-02-07 09:42:58 UTC

- reply

This isn't about people being just openly Nazi but for any "hate-related offense". If you want to tackle any such thing you might need to look into the root causes of the issues and try to fix those, including tackling concerns from the people who become hateful, such as living conditions, education, that sort of stuff. So much like with criminality. That's a lot more work than just the "tough on crime" approach of throwing everyone into jail for a year, minimum, and hoping that will work (or rather trying to show to your voters that you're doing something).
>Can you force them to shut the fuck up with their hateful Nazi sit if they want to be a part of society? I think this will sure help.
It will be the same as anywhere that already has this sort of laws, people will be less obvious about it while the same hate and message is out there. I don't think this will affect anything that giving tougher fines wouldn't and it would cause more negatives than that does. You could even have stricter punishments for repeat offenders and do fines as day fines. But prison for a year for any such offense? The scale seems off, especially when you consider that the *maximum* for *terrorism related stuff* is six years.

2025-02-07 07:57:41 UTC

- reply

They were saying that fines are just a barrier for the poor, so I was asking if that holds true for all fines. That was the actual point you missed.
But sure, in the sense that neither should carry a mandatory jail sentence for a year, they're the same.

2025-02-06 19:18:58 UTC

- reply

Do you think the same about any traffic violation or all fines in general? We should throw people in the jail for a year, mnimum, because otherwise it's just a tax on not being rich enough for the crime?
Come on now. I'm all for having tougher sentences on the high end for hate related offenses, but a mandatory minimum being year in jail for *any* such offense, even some dipshit doing a Nazi salute and nothing is else, is just too much. It's like said, dipshit behaviour but hardly worth a year in jail. And it probably won't solve the issue anyway. Just putting people in jail seldom does imo. Yanks have already tried that.

2025-02-06 15:20:08 UTC

- reply

One year's mandatory jail term for any "hate-related offenses" seems a bit far imo. Should be just a fine at least for first offense *on the lightest end, unless it's some physical attack and stuff like that.