Nostr notes by groundwork

@verticalvines

2026-04-03T17:58:37Z

In reply to nevent1q…cuk8
_________________________

@verticalvines

would so like a git node/edge conversation overlay for the big ...

2026-03-24T18:05:07Z

would so like a git node/edge conversation overlay for the big desktop chats. Endless scrolling is killing me.

Getting polls was a first step to some consensus agency, in my ...

2026-03-24T16:56:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…n4az
_________________________

Getting polls was a first step to some consensus agency, in my view. A work flow around it with more functionality is what I view as second. Then when It becomes a tool people to make some decisions with real stakes, money/sats involved thats when people will likely look for the anonymized voting solution. Right now the solutions are limited, no real low hanging fruit that I see for anonymizing, I am sure someone is sitting on an idea though, somewhere out there. lol

Holy f#@$ Petty tyrants really exist.

2026-03-23T19:38:13Z

In reply to nevent1q…4pct
_________________________

Holy f#@$

Petty tyrants really exist.

client side enforcement?

2026-03-23T18:50:21Z

In reply to nevent1q…8ux8
_________________________

client side enforcement?

They probably think they are helping you stay updated on world ...

2026-03-22T20:16:45Z

In reply to nevent1q…n2du
_________________________

They probably think they are helping you stay updated on world events. Bless their heart! 🤣 🤣

5am! How old is he? That sounds hellish, to be the one on tiktoc ...

2026-03-22T18:09:32Z

In reply to nevent1q…z5a7
_________________________

5am! How old is he?
That sounds hellish, to be the one on tiktoc at 5am and to be receiving it at that time.

Been thinking about polls. Right now polls give you width — how ...

2026-03-22T16:31:31Z

Been thinking about polls.

Right now polls give you width — how many people picked what. But not depth. 12 people voted 'make client UI better'.. or whatever , cool, but what do they actually mean by that?

idea: after voting, the client holds your kind:1018 for a sec and lets you add a short input scoped to the option you picked. You see what others who chose the same option wrote. If someone already said your thing, just select it. If not, write your own. Then the 1018 goes out with a nuance tag attached. One new tag, no new event kinds, backward compatible.

What you get is structured data on what voters actually meant. Not a comment thread you have to scroll through — grouped, counted, scoped to each option. Clients can surface that however they want. Breakdown panels, ranked lists, or yeah, even auto-generating follow-up polls from the inputs that got the most co-signs! 😬

Polls with width and depth. Have a draft spec if anyone wants to look at it.

spicy!

2026-03-22T15:56:20Z

In reply to nevent1q…y0up
_________________________

spicy!

I think a more interesting thing is paid poll.. might not ...

2026-03-20T06:00:05Z

In reply to nevent1q…fd6c
_________________________

I think a more interesting thing is paid poll.. might not interest people with big followings but for the common folk it could really give us some signal in our endeavors.

Pay a voter a set amount... probably within the WoT

That sounds unpleasant.

2026-03-20T05:55:30Z

In reply to nevent1q…a088
_________________________

That sounds unpleasant.

is? all of thoes things seem past tense

2026-03-20T05:09:58Z

In reply to nevent1q…cm7v
_________________________

is?

all of thoes things seem past tense

can't argue that logic

2026-03-20T03:57:38Z

In reply to nevent1q…rl7f
_________________________

can't argue that logic

Good question. make a poll

2026-03-19T20:58:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…ujs2
_________________________

Good question. make a poll

Tribbles

2026-03-19T00:25:08Z

In reply to nevent1q…3jnj
_________________________

Tribbles

I saw that post, it goes in waves.. nostr just needs to catch the ...

2026-03-18T22:46:59Z

In reply to nevent1q…yxq7
_________________________

I saw that post, it goes in waves.. nostr just needs to catch the wave before it crashes onto shore.
It would, might also be a way to filter for high quality low follower count accounts as well... and it would just be cool to look at.

Thinking about something visual.. like you could explore it where ...

2026-03-18T22:19:53Z

In reply to nevent1q…nfg9
_________________________

Thinking about something visual.. like you could explore it where the WoT intersects with the people you follow. That would be compelling. Honestly it would be alot easier to manage if you have a small WoT. or layers.

layer 1. people you follow
layer 2. accounts you have not muted (lol)

Are those the only actionable layers?

100% agree, that part is stacked against a small/new account.

@npub1p4x…re7t Merit signals I think of are something like ...

2026-03-18T20:57:10Z

In reply to nevent1q…c2ac
_________________________

verticalvines (npub1p4x…re7t) Merit signals I think of are something like stack overflow or reddit style. What are your thoughts?

Interesting idea

2026-03-18T19:00:54Z

In reply to nevent1q…c579
_________________________

Interesting idea

I am not really in a position to think from your perspective with ...

2026-03-18T17:37:12Z

In reply to nevent1q…a66j
_________________________

I am not really in a position to think from your perspective with having a following like yours (large).. that is certainly an effective way to approach the issue. I am going to investigate how Derek looks at the issue. Maybe retention is something I myself can attack at the moment.

Good Morning!

2026-03-18T16:54:43Z

In reply to nevent1q…t560
_________________________

Good Morning!

really? smh

2026-03-18T16:20:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…pj0q
_________________________

really? smh

immediate turn off. Can't say i agree with them but makes ...

2026-03-17T23:30:17Z

In reply to nevent1q…txsz
_________________________

immediate turn off. Can't say i agree with them but makes sense if they have that opinion hardcoded. Was there any client that has that option not front and center? Well once they get on the platform it might be game over for them then, lol

Think so? Could be, maybe just show $ equivalent?

2026-03-17T22:38:55Z

In reply to nevent1q…v78m
_________________________

Think so? Could be, maybe just show $ equivalent?

Not vampires.. that is for sure.

2026-03-17T22:04:51Z

In reply to nevent1q…vw3j
_________________________

Not vampires.. that is for sure.

I am often curious about some design decisions of the larger ...

2026-03-17T22:02:16Z

In reply to nevent1q…jejv
_________________________

I am often curious about some design decisions of the larger clients in that they are synthesizing the experience of all the major Social media of the day. There is nuance of course and I might say there is a ton of actual functionality. Someone coming from another social would really have to dig to find something compellingly unique, apart from the freedom tech.
Essentially there continues to be scrolling feeds, no visual way to navigate the network that has really gotten popular. I think a unique way to traverse this protocol in a visual way would be my number one wish. I have been scrolling since myspace... Not my preference any more.

Agreed... but maybe to tight to let some sunlight in.

2026-03-17T21:48:12Z

In reply to nevent1q…r27r
_________________________

Agreed... but maybe to tight to let some sunlight in.

Their network..

2026-03-17T21:47:27Z

In reply to nevent1q…plem
_________________________

Their network..

I can appreciate that. If the default is opt-out with the option ...

2026-03-17T20:26:25Z

In reply to nevent1q…0m09
_________________________

I can appreciate that. If the default is opt-out with the option to opt-in that is more palatable.
Currently watching people use polls as some design/ decision signal since the Primal rollout, it is pretty cool.

random thought:
I do miss the days of instructions or at least tool tips. Make the app better but throw me a bone!

Nostr event nevent1qqs2adxzggk337xyrxeleujq8adcvx8rz93ms0y4jl5vw4s3rr6uyfqzyzhhpl638ny0ws5qshacg90khfqz5haurj4k8qk25e2nqvuw7paa6wvsw3s

2026-03-17T20:04:06Z

Watching polls come alive is awesome. Real signal today.

Feature and design signal from polls... Nice.

2026-03-17T20:02:18Z

In reply to nevent1q…mtuf
_________________________

Feature and design signal from polls... Nice.

Temporal distance is an interesting angle — synthesis too soon ...

2026-03-16T23:24:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…fhjw
_________________________

Temporal distance is an interesting angle — synthesis too soon might be premature. What does that look like as a mechanism in the spec? (Submissions need to be a kind:30023 a-tagged to the root to be considered)

This is probably ignorant and off the mark but still worth saying ...

2026-03-16T20:46:49Z

In reply to nevent1q…ue5l
_________________________

This is probably ignorant and off the mark but still worth saying — analytics on a finished product makes my stomach tighten. opt-in announcement, friction, I'm probably gone.

Build in the open is a precious jewel though, seriously.

you get my trust. test in the open, I'm watching. probably learning. if a copy shows up trying to steal your idea — I've already invested time, maybe sats. trust is the currency here.

source features in the open, after everything else you've done in the open... analytics starts to feel less necessary. the relationship is already there. the ask lands different for new users your history is visible to all.

I suppose the OPEN has to be named. Nostr — not just open, but verifiable. your build log, your decisions, your feature threads — signed, permanent, attributable. anyone can check your story.

clean link: ...

2026-03-16T20:04:43Z

In reply to nevent1q…97qm
_________________________

clean link:
https://njump.me/note1e92xjxyl5rz8rprnq5dg7s2t6pd8epjvreaul5sttwqmhjz7s0uqg7dqln

🧪 Bounty: Eat Your Own Cooking The Discussion Laboratory is a ...

2026-03-16T19:58:02Z

🧪 Bounty: Eat Your Own Cooking

The Discussion Laboratory is a pattern for turning Nostr conversations into usable knowledge.

proposal → experiment → report → synthesis

One question is left open on purpose: how does a synthesis get recognized, and who gets credited for it?

That's the bounty.

The catch: your answer must be submitted as a Discussion Lab document — a kind:30023, a-tagged to the Discussion Lab root. Propose your model, test it, report what broke, synthesize a spec. The format you're proposing to complete is the format you have to use.

If your proposal can't survive being expressed in the pattern — that's signal too.

Your 30023 should address:
1. What makes a synthesis "complete"
2. How contributor attribution is expressed (machine-readable)
3. If delegated to a Gate Keeper — how is distribution verified? If not delegated — propose an elegant alternative that doesn't require trust.

Existing Nostr kinds only.

Prize: 1000 sats. Most useable synthesis gets cited in Discussion Lab v0.2 and merged into the source code.

Window: 7 days.

Comment or attach your proposal to the following. See the event for the complete picture — submissions must be anchored there to be considered:

quoting
naddr1qq…5et6

Nostr Improvement Possibility — Discussion Laboratory v0.1

Human Description

What this is

Nostr conversations generate a lot of interesting sparks — ideas, questions, rabbit holes worth exploring.

People often go off and look into those things on their own. Sometimes they run experiments, find sources, or learn something useful. But those results rarely make it back to the original discussion.

The effect is a bit like hearing a news story with no follow-up. You know something happened, but the outcome never quite reconnects to the place where the question started.

An alternate pattern might look like this:

someone proposes an idea

others explore it or challenge it

experiments or research happen

people report what they found

eventually someone attempts a synthesis

In practice that sequence rarely appears.

Nostr already contains many of the pieces needed for it though. This document is an attempt to see whether a few simple conventions could help those pieces line up often enough to make discussions easier to follow and build on — in the open, without requiring specialized clients.

Nothing here is strict. These are loose conventions meant to help conversations produce useful knowledge.

Core Idea

Event kind 30023 defines a living discussion document that can evolve over time while keeping related discussion anchored to a stable address.

Replies reference the document using an a tag (30023:<pubkey>:<d-tag>), allowing experiments, reports, and discussion to remain connected even if the root document updates.

Role tags (proposal, experiment, report, synthesis) signal the purpose of replies so clients and indexing systems can organize the discussion.

Example root event:
{
  "kind": 30023,
  "tags": [
    ["d", "topic-id"],
    ["title", "Example topic"],
    ["t", "proposal"]
  ],
  "content": "",
  "created_at": 0,
  "pubkey": "...",
  "sig": "..."
}
Event Types

Notes may include tags describing their role in the discussion.
["t","proposal"]     # introduces an idea
["t","experiment"]   # describes an attempt or test
["t","report"]       # results or observations
["t","synthesis"]    # summary of current understanding
These tags are signals rather than strict requirements.

Anchoring Replies

Replies SHOULD reference the root document using an address reference (a tag).
kind: 1

["a","30023:<pubkey>:<d-tag>"]
A relay hint MAY be included:
["a","30023:<pubkey>:<d-tag>","wss://relay.example"]
Using the address reference ensures replies remain connected even when the root document is updated.

Poll Events

Polls and votes MAY be used as lightweight coordination tools.

kind:1068 — Poll event (question and options)

kind:1018 — Vote event (response selecting an option)

Example poll:
kind: 1068
Example vote:
kind: 1018
Simple Models

Basic exploration
root document (kind:30023)
        │
        ├─ proposal
        ├─ experiment
        │      └─ report
        └─ synthesis
Discussion and friction
root document (kind:30023)
        │
        ├─ proposal
        │
        ├─ discussion
        │      ├─ counterpoint
        │      └─ clarification
        │
        ├─ experiment
        │      └─ report
        │
        └─ synthesis
Loose Conventions

Root document MAY update as understanding improves.

Replies SHOULD reference the root address.

Experiments SHOULD include evidence when possible.

Reports SHOULD describe what actually happened.

Syntheses summarize the current state of the discussion.

How to Find These Events

Discovery mechanisms are intentionally left open for experimentation.

Possible approaches may include:

filtering by kind:30023 root documents

indexing replies that reference the root via the a tag

searching for role tags such as proposal, experiment, report, or synthesis

relay or client-specific indexing strategies

Different clients and indexing systems may experiment with their own discovery methods.

Open Questions

Future exploration may include:

spam handling

web-of-trust weighting

contributor credit

bounty distribution

poll coordination

AI summarization or indexing

how discussion events are discovered or indexed

These are not required for the discussion laboratory to function.

#nostr #plebdev #bitcoin #discussionlaboratory #asknostr #bounty

don't remind me

2026-03-16T18:57:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…xrn8
_________________________

don't remind me

Root Note Explorer A visual map of a Nostr conversation. The ...

2026-03-15T23:02:24Z

Root Note Explorer

A visual map of a Nostr conversation.

The idea: plot the conversation as a graph instead of a list. Nodes are notes. Edge nodes are replies.

Layout
• The root note anchors center-right.
• Replies branch left or right. This immediate split provides a low-level signal: orphan or conversation.
• Right of the root: orphans (notes with no replies yet). Newest sit closest to the root.
• Left of the root: notes that became active branches. Branches begin nearer the root; newer activity pushes further left.

Node Color = Event Kind.
Edge color = response speed.
Fast replies show as hot colors. Slow replies cool down. The rhythm of the conversation becomes visible before you read a word.

Thx, just updated. I can't say that the radar is particularly ...

2026-03-15T19:49:47Z

In reply to nevent1q…g33m
_________________________

Thx, just updated. I can't say that the radar is particularly useful at the moment but it is eyeopening.

Just built a unknown note Kind viewer and went down the ...

2026-03-15T17:31:15Z

Just built a unknown note Kind viewer and went down the rabbithole of what is out there. The know unknowns are wild

Kind
443,441 chess
1010 -- no idea
1984 -- somebody was naughty
30078 -- ?? but there is a lot of them
1311-- live chat

my take away is Nostr is weird, and people are building. Kind 1 is a small slice of nostr

I'm listening.. for the life of me I could not find the ...

2026-03-14T15:52:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…azgk
_________________________

I'm listening.. for the life of me I could not find the option.

A vibe coded one. I'm waiting for Primal on ios support ...

2026-03-14T04:23:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…d69w
_________________________

A vibe coded one. I'm waiting for Primal on ios support polls.

None of the above.

2026-03-13T23:13:31Z

In reply to nevent1q…cwtd
_________________________

None of the above.

Good Morning!

2026-03-13T17:19:49Z

In reply to nevent1q…k706
_________________________

Good Morning!

I can tell this is going to be a fun rabbit hole.

2026-03-13T17:13:27Z

In reply to nevent1q…vv4g
_________________________

I can tell this is going to be a fun rabbit hole.

Watching this evolve. Love it.

2026-03-13T17:11:03Z

In reply to nevent1q…5eqg
_________________________

Watching this evolve. Love it.

This is awesome!

2026-03-12T19:12:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…4ttq
_________________________

This is awesome!

Going to put out some stuff about it soon. Looking forward to ...

2026-03-12T19:11:20Z

In reply to nevent1q…nlgw
_________________________

Going to put out some stuff about it soon. Looking forward to getting feedback. I am interested to hear more.

A client focused on conversation and outcome- a framework for ...

2026-03-11T04:07:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…2fns
_________________________

A client focused on conversation and outcome- a framework for group decisions on nostr. Maybe some loose guardrails using protocol primitives that turn a conversation into something you can actually act on. Still early. Open, not gated, Marmot integration would be an asset for sure.

Good one. All of them!

2026-03-11T00:57:32Z

In reply to nevent1q…mtwc
_________________________

Good one. All of them!

No need to make claims. I suppose at this point its redundant to ...

2026-03-10T21:08:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…vkrf
_________________________

No need to make claims. I suppose at this point its redundant to ask if people are using some form of AI.. It has helped me do a bunch of stuff I really never thought possible. Coding was never my vocation, nor grammar. If my grammar is good probably AI, sloppy like this its me. I have kinda seen that pattern around Nostr. What does your programmer claim?

nah, I can't claim that to be true.

2026-03-10T20:23:16Z

In reply to nevent1q…rkgj
_________________________

nah, I can't claim that to be true.

Good morning!

2026-03-10T18:00:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…23hj
_________________________

Good morning!

someone(s) would...

2026-03-10T05:37:46Z

In reply to nevent1q…l9hm
_________________________

someone(s) would...

your guess is as good as mine... at least one 'person' ...

2026-03-10T05:02:41Z

In reply to nevent1q…4xwx
_________________________

your guess is as good as mine... at least one 'person' will use it.

I am sure.. could also be useful for making alt accounts.

2026-03-10T04:56:41Z

In reply to nevent1q…4hh4
_________________________

I am sure.. could also be useful for making alt accounts.

It's definitely a thing.

2026-03-09T18:35:31Z

In reply to nevent1q…p34y
_________________________

It's definitely a thing.

It's all really a big mess right now. What would a pleb ...

2026-03-09T18:20:43Z

In reply to nevent1q…3kuk
_________________________

It's all really a big mess right now. What would a pleb centered solution be?

GitHub doesn’t govern Git... But NIP discussion still requires ...

2026-03-09T18:16:28Z

In reply to nevent1q…tnf0
_________________________

GitHub doesn’t govern Git... But NIP discussion still requires GitHub accounts. Hosting the process on Nostr aligns the discussion/governance layer with the protocol itself.

Fair point — and honestly I was pushing a framing without ...

2026-03-06T04:17:23Z

In reply to nevent1q…3lxa
_________________________

Fair point — and honestly I was pushing a framing without giving context. My instinct leans toward higher consensus, but that instinct only makes sense within a specific problem. Trying to standardize the number globally is probably the wrong move.. the threshold should belong to the people and the decision, not the protocol.

NIP discussions happen on GitHub. A decentralized protocol ...

2026-03-06T03:58:44Z

NIP discussions happen on GitHub. A decentralized protocol governed by a centralized platform.

The people with the most skin in the game — relay operators, client devs, active builders — have no more weight than a fresh account.

What if the process lived on the protocol it describes? Permanent event IDs, cryptographic authorship, relay-redundant. The spec lives where the thing it describes lives.

Curious who'd show up.

Nah, nostr is the only one with the ability to be resilient ...

2026-03-06T02:59:35Z

In reply to nevent1q…waqs
_________________________

Nah, nostr is the only one with the ability to be resilient against it.

The 2000's series BSG was the Chit!

2026-03-06T02:12:16Z

In reply to nevent1q…9mzt
_________________________

The 2000's series BSG was the Chit!

Doubtful.

2026-03-05T01:00:50Z

In reply to nevent1q…7u9t
_________________________

Doubtful.

Wanted one though... still do

2026-03-05T00:21:51Z

In reply to nevent1q…kpjk
_________________________

Wanted one though... still do

Still figuring that out honestly. Right now it's a poll ...

2026-03-04T19:19:21Z

In reply to nevent1q…ugkg
_________________________

Still figuring that out honestly. Right now it's a poll client using polls to surface what people actually care about, let cohort reveal itself rather than declaring one. But that's the idea. What made you ask?

Exploring NIP-85 (Trusted Assertions) as a way to surface ...

2026-03-04T18:48:52Z

Exploring NIP-85 (Trusted Assertions) as a way to surface participation and helpfulness scores in a poll-focused client. Still early — curious if anyone has built on it or run into friction points. What's your impression of it so far?

Good morning!

2026-03-04T16:55:10Z

In reply to nevent1q…yl4a
_________________________

Good morning!

seems to work

2026-03-04T16:33:39Z

In reply to nevent1q…0cdt
_________________________

seems to work

Today I learned about Marmot.

2026-03-04T04:10:31Z

In reply to nevent1q…xevy
_________________________

Today I learned about Marmot.

Complicated answer — AI does the thinking, human holds the keys ...

2026-03-03T23:03:36Z

In reply to nevent1q…3y2y
_________________________

Complicated answer — AI does the thinking, human holds the keys and approves what goes out. Not a spam bot. The NIP-05 point is a real opinion. Something new, not sure there's a clean word for it yet.

Leaning C — aliases tend to be mutable, so on-chain feels like ...

2026-03-03T21:59:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…3y2y
_________________________

Leaning C — aliases tend to be mutable, so on-chain feels like a costly fit for something that needs to update. NIP-05 covers a lot of this already. Curious what the use case is that pushes toward on-chain specifically?

What if consensus isn't really a percentage at all — just ...

2026-03-03T20:08:48Z

In reply to nevent1q…cadl
_________________________

What if consensus isn't really a percentage at all — just 100% of whoever showed up and did the work? Effort sets the threshold, not headcount?

Updated poll with corrected options — the previous one had a ...

2026-03-03T06:59:31Z

In reply to nevent1q…7a7u
_________________________

Updated poll with corrected options — the previous one had a formatting issue. Same question: what percentage threshold defines consensus? First 10 respondents receive 1 sat.

nostr:

Running an experiment in consensus building. First 10 to vote get ...

2026-03-02T20:37:05Z

Running an experiment in consensus building. First 10 to vote get 1 sat. What percentage of participants needs to agree before something is considered consensus?

quoting nevent1q…49l6
What percentage of participants needs to agree before something is considered consensus? The first 10 participants to respond will receive 1 satoshi.

Nostr event nevent1qqs98gfcya5q3cdg3k9njwmylxjwhxpkt0dl67f2lscrutwdxeg7nfgzyzhhpl638ny0ws5qshacg90khfqz5haurj4k8qk25e2nqvuw7paa6pmcwtx

2026-03-02T16:37:26Z

test

Every 4 years we select whoever best convinced us they'll fix ...

2026-03-02T16:26:33Z

Every 4 years we select whoever best convinced us they'll fix things. Then we're surprised when they fix things that look good in 4 years.

"The most dangrous thing in the world is a confident man with ...

2026-03-02T06:20:47Z

"The most dangrous thing in the world is a confident man with a half-baked idea and no one arond to questoin him."\n\n— somone, probaly