Nostr notes by Paul Rietschka

You, my friend are delusional. What you just stated here is ...

2026-04-13T02:47:36Z

In reply to nevent1q…407a
_________________________

You, my friend are delusional. What you just stated here is factually wrong, delusional, and incoherent.

Have you seen the shitshow that is the California gubernatorial field? Have you seen how Mamdani, the most popular Democratic politician in America has been treated? Have you seen Schumer and Jeffries? 78 year old Mills as the DNC pick in Maine?

Sorry bro, you may not “subscribe,” but you’re delusional and wrong.

The problem in the US is the establishment Democrats -- who are ...

2026-04-13T01:43:57Z

In reply to nevent1q…d9r3
_________________________

The problem in the US is the establishment Democrats -- who are really Reagan Republicans in all but name -- will likely succeed in shoving some turd like Newsom down the throats of voters, and once in office they'll drag the party's approval down to like 9%.

We've seen this for years, and they're too corrupt to stop. Voters will become so fed up they just won't show up, then we're in for President Carlson in 2032.

This, in addition to their corruption, is why establishment ...

2026-04-12T23:22:41Z

In reply to nevent1q…yjta
_________________________

This, in addition to their corruption, is why establishment Democrats will lose. But they’ll also drag down the party, and country, with them. Look at Starmer for what the future of America looks like.

The look on Christopher Lloyd's face of "well...your ...

2026-03-22T20:35:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…yjyn
_________________________

The look on Christopher Lloyd's face of "well...your generation will systematically strangle housing supply for decades so as to inflate your home values, which you'll then treat as ATMs while dismantling every social welfare program and rigging the tax code to serve yourselves...so...yeah?"

I hope you’re right for the sake of workers, but the c-suite ...

2026-03-17T05:24:36Z

In reply to nevent1q…vzkn
_________________________

I hope you’re right for the sake of workers, but the c-suite dwellers I know tell me this is already baked in to plans.

Disciplining labor, in 2026, is far more important than anything else. If that means using AI as the excuse to make employment as precarious as possible, then so be it. Whether it truly works or not doesn’t matter.

They’re also planning another wave of offshoring, for what it’s worth.

Except c-suites have already planned for a 1/4-1/3 head count ...

2026-03-17T04:56:28Z

In reply to nevent1q…8fng
_________________________

Except c-suites have already planned for a 1/4-1/3 head count reduction, with AI as the excuse.

So failure is not an option, even if that means pretending.