npub1ynlz3qpjg3zsmskuy80hmy6vgv5kht4kugld9mvd36fxuy8kgm9qf9873s (npub1ynl…873s) npub1w0h29g47254sgmjuaza0qj6cmvwd6qs9rffjyt34a4xs37rfu0sskruwua (npub1w0h…uwua) npub1qmlark5zym2u576hfmecfaa2els8eln4rxls76z24l3g7pq48rvq2ymdus (npub1qml…mdus) npub185nxz5z2ex5ukwq3yyu0tun5lmfj52syl39f77c3px750rrm75tqf2luq0 (npub185n…luq0)
I hope you're both not still angry with eachother. I would like to understand the technical details here. If I'm not mistaken, what Daniel is saying is that conversation's persistent client-server connection is more battery efficient than signal's (when not using GCM). It does not seem to me like the connection method itself is affected by the difference in scale between both apps. I.e., could signal not use a similar approach to improve batterylife?
jobangles /
npub1h3…ygpg9
2023-12-16 10:08:55
in reply to nevent1q…g6t7
Author Public Key
npub1h3x4tt35u5gedg8p2t0g6n27l7gkdnlsfc9y6ekl3udqqc79u0mqwygpg9Published at
2023-12-16 10:08:55Event JSON
{
"id": "b7e451399656bc71cb04e42c99bbf4b4f9ebaaa824cfd3bddcc3bc66c01c7a61",
"pubkey": "bc4d55ae34e51196a0e152de8d4d5eff9166cff04e0a4d66df8f1a0063c5e3f6",
"created_at": 1702721335,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"24fe28803244450dc2dc21df7d934c43296baeb6e23ed2ed8d8e926e10f646ca",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"73eea2a2be552b046e5ce8baf04b58db1cdd02051a53222e35ed4d08f869e3e1",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"06ffd1da8226d5ca7b574ef384f7aacfe07cfe7519bf0f684aafe28f041538d8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"3d2661504ac9a9cb38112138f5f274fed32a2a04fc4a9f7b1109bd478c7bf516",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"a4237e420cdb0b3231d171fe879bcae37a2db7abf2f12a337b975337618c3ac2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"20502883ace25666fa4de12ff6fc01b2a6a654d89e28342ed523c3d262c4a2fc",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9be21611a341426e9146257c54179e22d178bb7d4106e247ddf3e507b7985a6b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"d70a704d1b4f1fe47730b7dc4fbc969c5c704a6af090c652c58ce199af2c8de1",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"f6ce7dd187ac3b13840ed2a007b085ca0e2d0662dcc0b7860d518afb090af734",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.world/users/jobangles/statuses/111589545435197906",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ynlz3qpjg3zsmskuy80hmy6vgv5kht4kugld9mvd36fxuy8kgm9qf9873s nostr:npub1w0h29g47254sgmjuaza0qj6cmvwd6qs9rffjyt34a4xs37rfu0sskruwua nostr:npub1qmlark5zym2u576hfmecfaa2els8eln4rxls76z24l3g7pq48rvq2ymdus nostr:npub185nxz5z2ex5ukwq3yyu0tun5lmfj52syl39f77c3px750rrm75tqf2luq0 \n\nI hope you're both not still angry with eachother. I would like to understand the technical details here. If I'm not mistaken, what Daniel is saying is that conversation's persistent client-server connection is more battery efficient than signal's (when not using GCM). It does not seem to me like the connection method itself is affected by the difference in scale between both apps. I.e., could signal not use a similar approach to improve batterylife?",
"sig": "edc0d0a5f4f5f11f4c61d6d45175118844feaf8c166dd6720a22815d88aa14b38f8681258282fcb44c545d243e391ff9856f3da5a43e6dbab504c0290d0cede7"
}