alanajoy on Nostr: MAMA BEAR RANT INCOMING: If you’re concerned about “groomers” but aren’t ...

MAMA BEAR RANT INCOMING:

If you’re concerned about “groomers” but aren’t concerned about Andrew Tate you’re not the one to be calling people “sheep”. He encourages men to date teens (our daughters) because they are “easier to imprint”.

If that’s not a groomer, what is?

If you are a parent and subscribe to his nonsense, I’m sincerely concerned. If your values center around family and you subscribe to his nonsense, you’re a hypocrite of the worst order.

Regardless of age, any man talking about “imprinting” the minds of our daughters is a danger. As a father, do you want some man attempting to imprint the mind of your 19-year-old daughter, who has not developed enough sophistication to spot the lover boy tactics he teaches?

He is openly predatory and preaches manipulation, control, and violence against our daughters to exploit them for financial gain. It’s sickening.

If your age ends in “teen” you are still developmentally not an adult: regardless of legality. Child marriage is still “legal” in most states. Is that your parameter as a parent? The law??

Let me catch some sleazy 36 year old “lover boy” coming anywhere near my daughter and I’ll show you why we have the 2nd amendment.

But groomers aren’t targeting the daughters that are cared for: they’re targeting the most vulnerable. Those without stable families. If it takes a village to raise a child it’s all of our responsibilities to look out for young, vulnerable, impressionable girls.

If you’re of the “real man” outlook, this is your view. Protect the most vulnerable. Where’s your family values as you support a man who encourages busting out a machete on and choke holding young women? I’ve had it with some of y’all.