Your realize that is fallacious reasoning, right? It doesn't matter is 99% of people believe something, that doesn't make it true. For example, "all" the experts told us to get an untested shot 3 years ago.
How is it the 'uneducated' skeptics were right about the shots not being effective and being unsafe, yet all the experts got it wrong? Those 'experts' continue to double-down to this day, despite the fact that people are dropping dead all the time. It is a cult, just like other fields of science are a treated like a cult. That is why when criminals like Peter Hotez got offered millions of dollars for a charity of his choice to debate RFK, he ran away like the little scumbag that he is.
These people are frauds. Appealing to experts or credentials is a fallacy, it has no substance in terms of evidence.
Einstein stole his work from Henre Poncaire; he was a total fraud that even Tesla called out. Feynman couldn't explain what magnetism is, despite being one of the leading experts in his field. These people are all the same; hiding behind their credentials, virtue signalling and whining like a bunch of children because they are intellectually inept when it comes to the expertise they pretend to have. NONE of them have the balls to have a debate - not on climate, not on geocentrism, not on virology.
You can reconcile that however you like, but to me, it is painfully obvious why that is.
sovereignbull / Sovereign Bull
npub180…jmehq
2024-08-19 16:29:22
in reply to nevent1q…vkny
Author Public Key
npub180x9vv4yuagf2w3qzmuertvv46ccee6n0wp0yh3zcz7nhyqrmzuqzjmehqPublished at
2024-08-19 16:29:22Event JSON
{
"id": "dae957a584e97f45734ad5432730948881b001c70665cfcacb18cfc4c19cd1bf",
"pubkey": "3bcc5632a4e750953a2016f991ad8caeb18ce7537b82f25e22c0bd3b9003d8b8",
"created_at": 1724084962,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d2bb5ee49ff9234c1c76f7eb13071c4e5d40a67c29633d74af999c1636780db1",
"ws://192.168.14.7:7777",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"85ce1e2f2380919ad282f996ffbe6bc97f38b50952c3dc6c8fa918641a2e3583",
"ws://192.168.14.7:7777",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3bcc5632a4e750953a2016f991ad8caeb18ce7537b82f25e22c0bd3b9003d8b8"
],
[
"p",
"7f1b2d20466fd5ff836c6bca1a0849f9c77162cfc00b7e708a9142763c021673"
]
],
"content": "Your realize that is fallacious reasoning, right? It doesn't matter is 99% of people believe something, that doesn't make it true. For example, \"all\" the experts told us to get an untested shot 3 years ago. \n\nHow is it the 'uneducated' skeptics were right about the shots not being effective and being unsafe, yet all the experts got it wrong? Those 'experts' continue to double-down to this day, despite the fact that people are dropping dead all the time. It is a cult, just like other fields of science are a treated like a cult. That is why when criminals like Peter Hotez got offered millions of dollars for a charity of his choice to debate RFK, he ran away like the little scumbag that he is.\n\nThese people are frauds. Appealing to experts or credentials is a fallacy, it has no substance in terms of evidence.\n\nEinstein stole his work from Henre Poncaire; he was a total fraud that even Tesla called out. Feynman couldn't explain what magnetism is, despite being one of the leading experts in his field. These people are all the same; hiding behind their credentials, virtue signalling and whining like a bunch of children because they are intellectually inept when it comes to the expertise they pretend to have. NONE of them have the balls to have a debate - not on climate, not on geocentrism, not on virology.\n\nYou can reconcile that however you like, but to me, it is painfully obvious why that is.\n",
"sig": "4cd20310f46bb7618bafb54811e7f8751d91a49a9eb891517efb28e64d1a893cecf22b1d0833a5b5eb456b376f22187ce9fe32b6ae5d98c48668c0f1a81ce6d0"
}