Exactly. Literally, the only single thing they highlighted is the individual domain and nothing else.
It *could* be because of racism. I won't throw that out the window entirely. But just simply "url is bad" is not, in itself, proof or any reason to make an assumption in itself. It could literally be because the specific website itself can't be trusted. I don't know.
What I do know is an immediate "you're a racist!" response to "website is bad" from a substack user is suspicious.
Nazo
npub1mr…luec3
2025-12-28 23:06:58 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…n8hn
Author Public Key
npub1mrwxa0h3ye3lmxfcjq32zwje6wng3zr5xn63ma6saxf42ehpgwzqfluec3Seen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2025-12-28 23:06:58 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "54ac02b890e7e13d4ec92dad64d4f1d2b48b7cd326f7bd80850d84fe035fbfed",
"pubkey": "d8dc6ebef12663fd99389022a13a59d3a688887434f51df750e9935566e14384",
"created_at": 1766963218,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"9c60fea7b455790553f99f12d09c70ffbdd68aa56a8dc622aa7403bea5c82692"
],
[
"e",
"539374b4594bfa9be400f607a81e130e875ee71d4770485cc3219f292cf1e080",
"",
"reply",
"9c60fea7b455790553f99f12d09c70ffbdd68aa56a8dc622aa7403bea5c82692"
],
[
"p",
"8b75413e643857a7513f06f610592e7b4437f1c99414782b33701f1b97886419"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/@nazokiyoubinbou/115799701490773259",
"web"
],
[
"p",
"d8dc6ebef12663fd99389022a13a59d3a688887434f51df750e9935566e14384"
],
[
"e",
"6004df431a2f187ec65ac07e577538632186cc22679e6b5c35365befab50ce3b",
"",
"root",
"9c60fea7b455790553f99f12d09c70ffbdd68aa56a8dc622aa7403bea5c82692"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/nazokiyoubinbou/statuses/115799701490773259",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mastodon.social/users/nazokiyoubinbou/statuses/115799701490773259",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Exactly. Literally, the only single thing they highlighted is the individual domain and nothing else.\n\nIt *could* be because of racism. I won't throw that out the window entirely. But just simply \"url is bad\" is not, in itself, proof or any reason to make an assumption in itself. It could literally be because the specific website itself can't be trusted. I don't know.\n\nWhat I do know is an immediate \"you're a racist!\" response to \"website is bad\" from a substack user is suspicious.",
"sig": "52e3a67e67bacfa32f776c48dca671f12051d534cffc92bc57513c0d4d23e4b02f2425e1cd4d3796557c62b1689418e3cf9985afb4b679c45b276b0097b3ba91"
}